Re: DAC Session

Text item:

Paul,

As Jon Powell stated, there were several concerns:

You said that typically 3 of 4 papers are rejected. If, as we surmised, we
needed at least 3 accepted papers to have a session, does that mean the forum
members need to generate 12 papers in order for anyone to get to present?
That's a fairly big disincentive.

There was a general feeling that a DAC session would be worthwhile, but with
products to deliver, many of us don't want to spend valuable time in the next
month writing a paper if there is only a small likelihood of it going anywhere.
How many papers does it take to reach critical mass, or is that an irrelevant
question?

Will

Sorry, I could not sit in on this morning's meeting.

What came of the DAC session discussion, if there
was one please?

Thanks,

Paul

Text item: External Message Header

The following mail header is for administrative use
and may be ignored unless there are problems.

***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***.

Date: Fri, 26 Aug 94 18:22:13 EDT
Subject: DAC Session
To: ibis@vhdl.org
Message-Id: <9408262222.AA29405@c11059-364dan.ece.ncsu.edu>
From: paulf@eos.ncsu.edu
Received: by c11059-364dan.ece.ncsu.edu (5.65/Eos/C-U-09Sep93)
        id AA29405; Fri, 26 Aug 1994 18:22:14 -0400
Received: from c11059-364dan.ece.ncsu.edu by vhdl.vhdl.org (4.1/SMI-4.1/BARRNet)
        id AA01778; Fri, 26 Aug 94 15:25:43 PDT
Received: from vhdl.vhdl.org by aurora.intel.com (5.65/10.0i); Fri, 26 Aug 94 15
Received: from aurora by ichips.intel.com (5.64+/10.0i); Fri, 26 Aug 94 15:30:44
Received: from ichips.intel.com by relay.jf.intel.com with smtp
        (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0qe9qa-000twdC; Fri, 26 Aug 94 15:34 PDT
Received on Wed Aug 31 08:44:03 1994