IBIS Open Forum Agenda for 3/11/94

Text item: Text_1

                      IBIS Open Forum Meeting Agenda
                               for 3/11/94

                         Bridge: Res:
                         (415) 904-8800 661901

All meetings are 8:00 AM to 10:00 AM PST (16:00 to 18:00 UTC). When you
call into the meeting, ask for the IBIS Open Forum and give the bridge
operator the reservation number.

Meeting Agenda
--------------

8:00 Check-in

      Intros of new IBIS participants Hobbs

      Review of 2/18/94 minutes Hobbs

      Miscellany/Announcements Hobbs

      Opens for new issues (reshuffle last 5 times?) All

      Treasurer's Report Hobbs

      Press updates Hobbs/All

      Progress toward enlisting new IC vendors All

      IBIS 2.0 Ratification Hobbs
      - DAC Conference 6/6 - 6/10
      - Steering Committee (5/20? Who? Where?)

      IBIS Cookbook Hobbs

8:30 Stnd. driver, quality of support, validation Hobbs, All

      BIRD 8, Spec. of V/I data monotonicity Crisafulli

      BIRD 9, Other model types Ross

      BIRD 2, VIH, VIL Thresholds for Inputs Powell

      Egg 1, mutual pin coupling (ready to hatch?) Bracken

9:00 Simulation temperatures (new BIRD?) Warriner

      Ramp measurement Reid, Ross, et. al.
      Egg 2, ramp table? Hobbs

      Spice-to-IBIS Converter Lipa (NCSU)

9:30 Canright paper Ward

      Formal BNF notation (BIRD?) Reed, Harr

      High freq. and EMI Goyal, et. al.

      Phased turn-on/off of multiple devices Powell

9:55 Wrap-up, Next Meeting Plans Hobbs

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A bit of humor from Will/Derrick:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Q: What is this?

 With mutuals regard, I think to the issue: orthogonal to the pin that is
 mapping that of that, the mutual is to one have if pins, can couplings be
 specified independently another they the pin. Long we exclude mappings as
 consideration of the as from general network (like in topologies that very one
 you the mail the message described a week famous two ago of). Problems anyway
 meant at least those in a fashion [Or isn't PinMapping_. not rigorous to
 handle]. If we come up with the pin spec for a describing mutual to -- (I'd
 pin couplings to like this still then do straightforward to). The concept,
 it's "parallel extend", combination to determine of the out into impedances
 board from seen looking devices connected the the bus the.

 To fact, that we're in about it now. Here's an earlier talking (Egg a BIRD
 even on how than do mutuals).

 to ] Pin2 :[Lmut Cmut Mutuals
 Pin1 1 2 Rmut -1n
 3 1e3 -01p1 1n 01e4

 Pin11p Columns " " numbers and pins which Pin2 contain coupled together of the
 Rmut are etc. Specify the columns of the interest. Values not every couplings
 must be (in coupling of specified); can the that the sparsity you have assume
 specified in self inductances [Pin been section (the about backward)]! It talk
 fits into compatibility and character sall 80 the only. I'm not about here
 thing where the sure is is is C on the outside it ("to" the node) the close
 node (board or the die inside).

 Near, Chris? Do you Kumar or an opinion, where C have be on should?

 Bracken Eric

A: Scrambled Egg! :-)
Received on Mon Mar 7 21:57:08 1994