Re: Re[2]: On Non-Monotonic Drivers

From: John Brennan <jbrennan@VNET.IBM.COM>
Date: Tue Sep 05 1995 - 04:43:55 PDT

The points are simulated, but hardware measurements have confirmed this
characteristic in real hardware. Each point on the curve is DC.

************************************************************************
John Brennan Internal: jbrennan@btv
IBM Microelectronics Internet: jbrennan@vnet.ibm.com
862C / 1000 River Road Tel: 802-769-6982 (Tie-Line: 446)
Essex Junction, VT 05452 Fax: 802-769-5882 (Tie-Line: 446)
************************************************************************

------------------ Referenced E-Mail ----------------------------

Date: Fri, 01 Sep 1995 11:52:10 MST
To: Arpad_Muranyi@ccm.fm.intel.com
cc: ibis@vhdl.org
From: sung.oh@tempe.vlsi.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]: On Non-Monotonic Drivers
Message-Id: <9509011852.AA02581@sedona>
Arpad,

It is a measured curve or a simulated one?
SPICE simulations may have a negative resistance in the saturation
region depending on velocity saturation parameters, which does not
happen in real devices.

Sung
----- Begin Included Message -----

>From Arpad_Muranyi@ccm.fm.intel.com Fri Sep 1 08:43 MST 1995
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 95 08:08:00 PDT
From: Arpad Muranyi <Arpad_Muranyi@ccm.fm.intel.com>
To: fvance@FirePower.COM, bob@icx.com
Cc: ibis@vhdl.org, si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
Subject: Re[2]: On Non-Monotonic Drivers
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 2012
X-Lines: 54

Text item:

One example is one of IBM's process in which the shape of the I-V curve looks
like the curve with the "*" vs. the normal shape shown with "-" (this is shown
here with their permission).

                          _ _-----------------
                          *
                    * *
                 * * * * * * * * *
               *
              *
             *

Even though IBM's circuit is not known to me, it seems that this can be achieve
d
by some kind of feedback. I agree with Jon Powell, it is important to know the
timing characteristics of this feedback path, however, if it is "instantaneous"
,
I think it could be ignored.

Arpad
==============================================================================
Does anyone else have an example of a non-monotonic output buffer?

Fred Vance

Text item: External Message Header

The following mail header is for administrative use
and may be ignored unless there are problems.

***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***.

Cc: ibis@vhdl.org, si-list@silab.eng.sun.com
Subject: Re: On Non-Monotonic Drivers
To: bob@icx.com ( Bob Ross)
Received: by NeXT Mailer (1.99.1)
Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.99.1)
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 95 19:05:21 -0700
Received: by protocol.FirePower.COM (NX5.67d/NX3.0X)
     id AA00780; Thu, 31 Aug 95 19:05:21 -0700
Message-Id: <9509010205.AA14506@oahu.FirePower.COM>
From: Fred Vance <fvance@FirePower.COM>
Received: from protocol by oahu.FirePower.COM (NX5.67d/NX3.0M)
     id AA14506; Thu, 31 Aug 95 19:05:23 -0700
Received: from oahu by FirePower.COM (NX5.67e/FPS-munged-v1.0)
     id AA15088; Thu, 31 Aug 95 19:05:26 -0700
Received: from FirePower.COM ([198.4.104.7]) by vhdl.vhdl.org (4.1/SMI-4.1/BARR
N
et)
     id AA09553; Thu, 31 Aug 95 19:13:34 PDT
Received: from vhdl.vhdl.org by hermes.intel.com (5.65/10.0i); Thu, 31 Aug 95 1
9
:09:43 -0700
Received: from hermes.intel.com by relay.jf.intel.com with smtp
     (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0soLY8-000tx9C; Thu, 31 Aug 95 19:09 PDT

----- End Included Message -----
Received on Tue Sep 5 04:52:08 1995

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 03 2011 - 09:52:29 PDT