DATE: 6/29/99
SUBJECT: 6/21/99 EIA IBIS Summit Meeting Minutes
VOTING MEMBERS AND 1999 PARTICIPANTS LIST:
AMP (Martin Freedman)
Applied Simulation Technology Raj Raghuram, Norio Matsui*, Neven Orhanovic
Avanti Nikolai Bannov
Cadence Design Mike LaBonte*
Cisco Systems Syed Huq*
Compaq Bob Haller*, Steve Coe, Shafir Rahman,
Maher Elasad
Cypress (Rajesh Manapat)
EMC Corporation Fabrizio Zanella
Fairchild Semiconductor [Peter LaFlamme], Craig Klem
H.A.S. Electronics (Haruny Said)
Hewlett Packard (EEsof, etc.) Paul Gregory, Henry Wu
High Design Technology Razvan Ene
HyperLynx (& Pads Software) Matthew Flora, Kellee Crisafulli, Lynne Green*
IBM Greg Edlund, Michael Cohen*, Praven Patel
Incases Olaf Rethmeier, Werner Rissiek, David Eagles,
Wilhelm Arnoldi, Ulrich Losch
Intel Corporation Stephen Peters*, Arpad Muranyi*, Frank Kern,
Martin Chang, Dave Moxley, Kerry Nelson,
Jeff Day, Richard Mellitz, Peter Liou,
Will Hobbs*, Henri Maramis*
LSI Logic (Symbios Logic) Scott King*
Mentor Graphics Bob Ross*, Mohamed Mahmoud, Sherif Hammad,
Jean Oudinot, Markku Kukkanen, Martin Groeber,
Karine Loudet, Hisham Gamal*, Evgeny Wasserman*
Mitsubishi (Tam Cao)
Motorola (Ron Werner)
National Semiconductor Milt Schwartz*
North East Systems Associates Edward Sayre, Michael Baxter, Kathy Breda
NEC (Hiroshi Matsumoto)
Philips Semiconductor Todd Andersen, Peter Christiaans
Quantic EMC (Mike Ventham)
Siemens Bernhard Unger, Christian Mitschke,
Manfred Maurer, Peter Kaiser, Wolfram Meyer,
Gerald Bannert, Harmut Ibowski, Katja Zuleeg,
Hans Pichlmaier, Eckhard Lenski, Kortheuer Udo,
Christian Sporrer
SiQual Scott McMorrow
Texas Instruments Jean-Claude Perrin, Shankar Balasubramaniah,
Ramzi Ammar, Thomas Fisher*
Thomson-CSF (Jean Lebrun)
Time Domain Analysis Systems Dima Smolyansky
Viewlogic Systems Chris Rokusek*, Guy de Burgh*, Cary Mandel,
(Jon Powell)
VeriBest Ian Dodd*
VLSI Technology D.C. Sessions*
Zuken-Redac (John Berrie)
OTHER PARTICIPANTS IN 1999:
3Dfx Interactive Ken Wu
Actel Corporation Silvia Montoya
Alcatel Steven Criel
Analytical Edge Robert Easson
Applied Microelectronics Brian Sanderson
BMW Friedrich Haslinger
Bogatin Enterprise Eric Bogatin
Bosch Telecom Detlef Wolf
ECI Telecom Daniel Adar
EIA [Patti Rusher], Cecilia Fleming*,
Dan Heinemeier
Electronique Catherine Gross
EFM Consulting Ekkehard Miersch
FCI John Ellis
Hitachi ULSI Hideki Fukuda*
Infineon Thomas Latzel*
Intracon Design Mike Osmond
Litton Systems Robert Bremer
Matsushita Atsuji Itoh*
Molex Incorporated Gus Panella
Nortel Networks Martin Hall (& at Viewlogic), Calvin Trowell*
Oce Printing Systems Ernst Deiringer
Praegitzer Design Rick Newell
Rockwell Collins Susan Tweeton, Ron Hau
Samsung Jung-Gun Byun, Cheol-Seung Choi
Shindengen Tsuyoshi Horigome*
Signals & Systems Engineering Tom Hawkins
STMicroelectronics Fabrice Boissieres, Philippe LeFevre
StorageTek Nick Krull
Sun Microsystems Victor Chang, Kevin Ko*
Tektronix Tom Brinkoetter
Teradyne Mikhail Khusid
VDOL Robert Novosel
Xilinx Susan Wu
(Unaffiliated, Retired) Bruce Wenniger
In the list above, attendees at the meeting are indicated by *. Principal
members or other active members who have not attended are in parentheses.
Participants who no longer are in the organization are in square brackets.
Upcoming Meetings: The bridge numbers for future IBIS teleconferences are as
follows:
Date Bridge Number Reservation # Passcode
July 23, 1999 (916) 356-9200 8-27037 9387986
All meetings are 8:00 AM to 9:55 AM Pacific Time. We try to have agendas out
7 days before each Open Forum and meeting minutes out within 7 days after.
When you call into the meeting, ask for the IBIS Open Forum hosted by Will
Hobbs and give the reservation number and passcode.
NOTE: "AR" = Action Required.
-------------------------------- MINUTES -------------------------------------
IBIS SUMMIT MEETING
The IBIS Summit Meeting was held at the Hilton Riverside Hotel in New Orleans,
Louisiana, near the site of the Design Automation conference (DAC99).
About 27 people representing 21 organizations participated. (14 member
companies participated).
The minutes just briefly note some meeting content and some other business and
discussions. Most of the presentations will be uploaded on the World Wide
Web at:
http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/summits/jun99/
Bob asked presentors who have not done so to send him electronic copies.
PRELIMINARY BUSINESS:
INTRODUCTIONS
Bob Ross opened the meeting by introducing Cecilia Fleming of the EIA and
thanking her for handling the meeting's logistical and food arrangements.
Bob noted that EIA has a booth at DAC which includes an IBIS poster created
by Alpert Designs. Bob also thanked Matthew Flora for handling the meeting
registration.
Bob introduced the current officers in attendance (Bob Ross, Chair, Stephen
Peters, Vice Chair, and unofficially Syed Huq, Webmaster), and also noted the
services of Matthew Flora, Secretary and Jon Powell, Librarian who could not
attend.
Bob also welcomed several new participants from Japan: Hideki Fukuda, Atsuji
Itoh, and Tsuyoshi Horigome. Everybody then introduced themselves.
PRESS AND WEB PAGE UPDATES
Bob Ross reported on several IBIS related articles. In the June 1999 issue
of Printed Circuit Design, Keith Felton and Todd Westerhoff wrote a guest
editorial article "High-Speed PCB Simulation, Is It Time for a Change?" on
pp. 42-45 & 63.
In the May 27, 1999 issue of EDN, the article by Dan Strassberg "Digital
Busses, Analog Problems" pp. 73-86 gives brief mention of IBIS.
In the June 7, 1999 issue of EE Times, Ed Sayre authored "Board Design Toes
Transmission Line", pp. 70 & 84 and provides general IBIS information.
"Signal Integrity and Behavioral Models of Digital Devices" by I.A. Maio, I.S.
Stievano, and F.G. Ganavero, Proceedings of the 1999 Zurich Symposium on EMC,
February 1999 investigates IBIS simulation algorithms.
DEADLINE FOR SP-4557
Bob Ross noted that the deadline for ballots was June 23, 1999. Signed
ballots needed to be returned to EIA by surface mail or by FAX. Cecilia
Fleming noted that a strong show of support is needed. So far about 12 Yes
votes had been received. Two contained some non-controversial comments.
Later in the meeting Bob discussed the two comments:
One comment suggested having Vmeas and Vref, Rref, and Cref mandatory for
output and I/O buffers. The initial rationale for making them optional was
to support upward compatibility from Version 1.1 level IBIS models which did
not support these subparameters.
The second comment was to implement the already approved BIRD58.3 editorial
changes to IBIS Version 3.2.
Bob suggested that a small group of officers review these and other comments
that will come in and draft the formal responses for the IBIS Open Forum to
review and approve.
The ANSI deadline is August 3, 1999. Bob expected comments received by EIA
after June 23, 1999 will still be considered.
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION:
IBIS 1998 - 1999 & MEETING OVERVIEW
- Bob Ross, Mentor Graphics
Bob Ross gave a brief summary of 1998 - 1999 progress. This included an
update on the standards. IBIS Version 3.2 was ratified January 15, 1999 and
is currently undergoing EIA and ANSI review as noted above. Also, IBIS
Version 2.1 is going to enter the next phase (FDIS). The only objection to
this was really a vote supporting IBIS Version 3.2 instead. Cecilia
Fleming mentioned that IBIS Version 3.2 may be put on a fast track after the
US ratification activity is completed.
Bob provided the current statistics for 1999 participation and membership
showing that the high level of IBIS activity has been maintained.
Bob noted that besides the formal ratification issues, the major areas of
concern are: IBIS Version 4.X additions, Connector Specification, s2ibis3
upgrade planning, IBIS User Group activities regarding the Accuracy
Specification and Educational program, and Relationships with EIAJ IMIC and
ECALS-2. The committee is following European EMC/EMI and JEDEC activity.
On education, Bob noted that material from Arpad Muranyi and Todd Westerhoff
could help seed the activity and has been uploaded to:
http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/training/
The remainder of the meeting was outlined as
Business (Annual Election of Officers, etc.)
Updates (Accuracy and s2ibis2/3 Committees)
New Ideas (Behavioral Inputs and Equations)
EIAJ Activities (IMIC and ECALS-2)
IBIS Version 4.X Features Discussions
Other Discussions and Ad Hoc Presentations
(We ran out of time for the IBIS Version 4.X features discussion.)
BUSINESS CONTINUED:
ELECTION OF OFFICERS
After some discussion, we added the position of Webmaster (to manage the Web
content). D.C. Sessions suggested that Postmaster (to manage the mailing
lists) also be added. The following people were nominated and unanimously
elected to serve for the 1999 - 2000 year:
Chair: Bob Ross, Mentor Graphics
Vice-chair: Stephen Peters, Intel
Secretary: Guy de Burgh, Viewlogic
Librarian: Jon Powell, Viewlogic
Webmaster: Syed Huq, Cisco Systems
Postmaster: Matthew Flora, HyperLynx
The motion was made to amend the bylaws and create the Webmaster and
Postmaster positions and corresponding job descriptions. This was approved
by a unanimous vote.
Will Hobbs asked what is needed for a quorum and what vote is needed. Bob
stated that he uses 5 as a quorum for teleconference meetings as stated in
the original bylaws. However, Cecilia Fleming noted that we need to align
our bylaws with EIA EP-20 for certain official votes. A majority of the
official members are required for some votes, and a two-thirds majority is
required for standards votes. Bob and Cecilia will research this.
AR - Bob Ross and Cecilia Fleming research what is needed to align the IBIS
bylaws with EP-20.
AR - Bob Ross and Cecilia write position definitions for the new positions of
Webmaster and Postmaster.
APPRECIATION PLAQUES
Cecilia Fleming and Will Hobbs (former Chair. of the EIA IBIS Open Forum)
provided EIA plaques to the following people who served as officers (official
and unofficial) in appreciation for their service during the last year:
Bob Ross
Stephen Peters
Matthew Flora
Jon Powell
Syed Huq
OPENS FOR NEW ISSUES
D.C. Sessions - JEDEC JC-42.3 Report (discussed next)
Tsuyoshi Horigome - Unscheduled presentation on Shidengen's Activity on EDA
Model and Simulation of Electric Circuit (added at the end of the meeting)
JEDEC JC-42.3 REPORT
D.C. Sessions who serves in a (mutual) liaison roll between the IBIS Open
Forum and JEDEC JC-42 reported on a recent Vancouver JEDEC JC-42.3 meeting
concerning Double Data Rate SDRAMs. The JEDEC committee concluded that
there is a characterization issue: the slew rate of 1V/ns depends on the
loading conditions. The JC-42.3 Committee requests a specification (from the
IBIS Open Forum) on derating the slew rate. The reason is that the current
derating method works in test conditions, but not in real designs.
PRESENTATIONS:
(These notes just summarize some of the contents and some discussions on the
presentations. Refer to the uploaded presentations for more content.)
IBIS ACCURACY SPECIFICATION DAC UPDATE
- Bob Haller, Compaq
Bob Haller commented on some recent updates to the Accuracy Specification:
VT table (golden waveform) and Open drain drivers, simplified correlation
levels, and a revised test board. The specification serves as a communication
vehicle and reference document. It is not perfect, nor does it cover IBIS
Version 3.2 features.
Bob asked for help regarding:
Test cases for the specification
Script/Code for the accuracy correlation metric (Bob has some Perl scripts
that need finishing before he can upload them)
Technical discussions in the IBIS Open Forum
Constructive feedback
Acceptance by Users, EDA and semiconductor vendors
Pursuit of EIA approval
Used by purchasing departments
In summary, he needs more volunteers, approvals and, in the future,
Version 3.2 enhancements.
Bob Ross noted that we will have a technical discussion at the next meeting.
The latest accuracy spec. (Version 1.2 document) has not yet been uploaded.
AR - Bob Ross put Version 1.2 document on the eda.org website:
http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/accuracy/
IBIS OPEN FORUM SPICE TO IBIS SUBCOMMITTEE STATUS REPORT
- Michael Cohen, IBM
Michael Cohen introduced the Subcommittee members and the mission to recommend
if the IBIS Open Forum should become responsible for the SPICE to IBIS
translator code. The secondary mission is to draft some enhancement and
bug fix requirements and suggest how to fund the project.
Michael discussed the meetings and activities to date. He also presented
Mike LaBonte's s2ibis flow to create an IBIS part model. Some general ideas
so far are to make the tools be platform and SPICE simulator independent, have
good documentation, and have maintainable code. Having a Web based tool is
not a goal.
Michael reported on feedback to date concerning the enhancement requests and
bug reports. Michael also noted that the developer Michael Steer from North
Carolina State University believes that the IBIS Golden Parser can be used for
the next generation of s2ibis3.
To summarize, the committee plans to compile a list of bugs and enhancement
requests, make a recommendation to the IBIS Open Forum, generate a list of
requirements, and help determine how to fund the project and get bids.
SPITRAN: A GUI FOR S2IBIS2
- Mike LaBonte, Cadence
Bob Ross introduced Mike LaBonte after commenting that the GUI interface
source code is expected to be made publicly available and may also be offered
for use in the s2ibis translator project.
Mike outlined its general features:
Written as a Java application - platform portable
Audits SPICE files
Prepares top level test circuits
Prepares s2ibis control files
Runs NCSU s2ibis2
For the remainder of the presentation Mike stepped through an application and
showed the GUI templates.
In response to comments during and after the presentation, Mike noted that
what he is presenting is based on alpha code that will need improvements. He
prefers multiple windows with simple questions rather than complex windows.
Blank space can be used for explanations. The GUI focuses on doing one buffer
at a time. Other code would be used to assemble the complete IBIS model.
ADVANCED BEHAVIORAL TIMING ADJUSTMENT
- Richard Mellitz, Intel
- Adapted and Presented by Stephen Peters, Intel
Stephen Peters introduced input buffer modeling by stating that Vinh and Vinl
specifications and corresponding derating methods are no longer realistic for
newer technologies. Actual input waveforms derate the data. One proposal
uses a charge approximation based on finding the area under the input voltage
versus time curve. Charge is assumed proportional to this area. Once the
threshold crossings are determined, the flight time is adjusted for charge
using an area based table. A similar adjustment method is used to determine
actual ringback severity.
This presentation prompted some discussion concerning the best approach for
modeling inputs. D.C. Session indicated that he had considered a similar
approach. He had presented at earlier meetings a different proposal based
on actual time derating tables using an empirically derived 3/2 power voltage
relationship. D.C. suggested he work with Stephen and Richard to agree upon
an Input modeling proposal and to submit a BIRD for a Version 4.X extension.
THOUGHTS ON EQUATIONS IN IBIS MODELS
- Arpad Muranyi, Intel
Arpad Muranyi provided background material to characterize SPICE, table
driven, and IBIS (or behavioral) models. All models are behavioral. One
differentiation is that SPICE models reveal process and circuit information,
table driven models can hide the process information, and IBIS models can
hide both process and circuit details.
Arpad listed benefits of using equations:
Equations are more compact
Equations are more flexible and general
Equations may be faster than lookup tables
Equations allow easy scalability
However, there can also be problems providing more burden to the model
developer and simulator tool.
Arpad gave examples where equations could be used in IBIS: Vinh, Vinl as a
function of voltage, C_comp as a function of I/O pad voltage, scaling of
I/V and V/T data, curve fitting of I/V and V/T data, etc.
Equations can assist in the proper accounting of GND and Vcc currents for
bounce simulations. This accounting also needs to includes how portions of
C_comp are attached to Vcc and GND for both current allocation and possible
decoupling effects. An actual simulation shows less bounce than predicted
by the standard IBIS model connected to GND.
Arpad also showed a "bleed through' effect that differ between PMOS and NMOS
pullups. Others noted this as "clock through" or "forward feedback".
Arpad also presented some ideas for considerations using equations for
modeling transfer functions, power distribution on the die, and treating the
model as a matrix - for the purpose of promoting more discussion on the
subject. Transfer function could deal with complex impedances or
conductances and other transformations. A possible 3 - model can be
considered.
EIAJ-IMIC
Hideki Fukuda, Hitachi
Hideki Fukuda, Chair of the I/O Interface Model Project Group under EIAJ in
Japan provided much material. Some points are highlighted below.
As an overview Fukuda-san gave the goals and history of the activity. The
group is positioned under the Technical Standard Center along with a
Package Electrical Characterization Project Group. Activity and numerous
meetings with the IBIS Open Forum began in August, 1996. One immediate
goal is to release Draft Version 1.2 in June, 1999.
Fukuda-san gave a general technical overview description of the I/O model,
IC, and Board components and of the table SPICE format. IMIC can be used for
signal integrity, power integrity and (in the future) EMI simulations
Some comparisons between IMIC and SPICE simulations for signal integrity and
power integrity situations. Table SPICE simulations performed faster, but
Stephen Peters questioned that since some of the results were done using
different SPICE simulators the algorithm differences may also contribute to
speed differences. However, good correlation was demonstrated for some test
cases with coupled ground and power lines.
Future work consists of
Creating application notes
- Signal Integrity of complex buffers
- Power/ground bounce
- Package electrical characterization
Dealing with new technologies
- Release an EMI model
- Characterize new types of packages
- Model a DRAM module
Fukuda-san outlined an approach for handling EMI emission form a board:
Use terminal currents to find the magnetic field of the circuits of the IC.
Model terminal currents by transforming a time varying resistor into a
voltage controlled MOSFET transistor
Simulate EM emission from the board through its cables
The simulation and modeling environment was classified into the Behavioral
World and the Netlist World. SPICE, IMIC, Netlist IC simulators and Netlist
PCB simulators fall in the Netlist World. IBIS and Behavioral based PCB
simulators fall into the Behavioral World. Some Netlist PCB simulators now
support IBIS, and IBIS models are being generated from s2ibis conversion.
IMIC models fall in between SPICE and IBIS models, and IBIS models could also
be generated from an IMIC to IBIS converter. IMIC models could support
Netlist Based PCB Simulators. Fukuda-san sees an expansion of IBIS to
support IMIC and some of the Netbase simulation environment. He concludes
that such a move would benefit all parties - the electronic equipment
industry, the EDA industry, and the IC industry. He also concludes that
joint work by IBIS and IMIC could improve the silicon interface in PCB
simulation.
OUTLINE OF ECALS-2 PROJECT AND INVESTIGATION ON EMC/EMI SIMULATION MODELS
FOR NON-ICS
- Atsuji Itoh, Matsushita
Atsuji Itoh, Chair of WG1 for Information Standardization showed ECALS-2
organizational structure. The overall goal of ECALS-2 is to standardize
component information and to establish information exchange protocols.
Funding is provided by MITI - Japan's Ministry of International Trade and
Industry. The WG1 activities are Standardization of Dictionary and EDA model
for electronic component information. One of its missions is to promote the
EDA mode Representation standard (EDA Simulation Model, Logic Symbol,
Footprint, etc.)
Another group (SWG12) is involved with confirming the validity of IBIS and
IMIC models for non-IC components and provide suggestions regarding IBIS
and IMIC. The primary application is EMC/EMI simulation for digital
consumer electronics and mobile applications.
The consumer electronic design is moving toward rapid digitalization, speed
(time to market and shortened lead times) and increased high speed, high
density PCBs. Innovations are being made in the design processes, but it
continues to be difficult to get simulation models of any format (IBIS, IMIC,
SPICE, etc.).
One focus of the WG1 group concerns non-IC EMC/EMI models for passive
components, connectors and discrete semiconductor devices. IBIS is currently
weak in comparison to SPICE for models of EMI filters and discrete networks.
IBIS can be used for power semiconductors.
Some preliminary results of discussions with model providers and users were
given. Some conclusions so far are:
Any data format is acceptable (IBIS, IMIC, SPICE),
Effort must be made to expedite format standardization and expansion
of the range of application,
Need a checking tool for full EDA support,
Standardization is required and relationships or migration between standard s
need to be established between IBIS, IMIC, IEC TC93/WG6.
SHINDENGENS'S ACTIVITY ON EDA Model AND SIMULATION OF ELECTRIC CIRCUIT
(Added presentation)
- Tsuyoshi Horigome, Shindengen Electric Mfg. Co.
Tsuyoshi Horigome offered a brief presentation illustrating the user problem
of getting EDA models in a timely manner.
He showed an example simulating noise in a power module circuit. Model
quality and cost are the primary issues, and it took nine months to get good
models.
FINAL COMMENTS:
Bob Ross reminded people to get their SP-4557 comments in.
IBIS Version 4.X Discussion was deferred. D.C. Sessions noted that the input
and coupled package extensions were critical. Bob noted that the connector
activity may relate to coupled package extensions.
The next teleconference meeting was proposed to be Friday, July 23, 1999 to
avoid conflicting with some vacation plans.
NEXT MEETING:
The next teleconference meeting will be on Friday, July 23, 1999 from 8:00 AM
to 10:00 AM.
==============================================================================
NOTES
IBIS CHAIR: Bob Ross (503) 685-0732, Fax (503) 685-4897
bob_ross@mentor.com
Modeling Engineer, Mentor Graphics
8005 S.W. Boeckman Road, Wilsonville, OR 97070
VICE CHAIR: Stephen Peters (503) 264-4108, Fax: (503) 264-4515
sjpeters@ichips.intel.com
Senior Hardware Engineer, Intel Corporation
M/S JF1-56
2111 NE 25th Ave.
Hillsboro, OR 97124-5961
SECRETARY: Guy de Burgh (805) 988-8250, Fax: (805) 988-8259
gdeburgh@viewlogic.com
Senior Manager, Viewlogic Systems
1369 Del Norte Rd.
Camarillo, CA 93010-8437
LIBRARIAN: Jon Powell (805) 988-8250, Fax: (805) 988-8259
jonp@qdt.com
Senior Scientist, Viewlogic Systems
1385 Del Norte Rd.
Camarillo, CA 93010
WEBMASTER: Syed Huq (408) 525-3399, Fax: (408) 526-5504
shuq@cisco.com
Signal Integrity Engineer, Cisco Systems
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, CA 95134-1706
POSTMASTER: Matthew Flora (425) 869-2320, Fax: (425) 881-1008
mbflora@hyperlynx.com
Senior Engineer, HyperLynx, Inc.
17641 NE 67th Court
Redmond, WA 98052
This meeting was conducted in accordance with the EIA Legal Guides and EIA
Manual of Organization and Procedure.
The following e-mail addresses are used:
ibis-request@eda.org
To join, change, or drop from either the IBIS Open Forum Reflector
(ibis@eda.org), the IBIS Users' Group Reflector (ibis-users@eda.org)
or both. State your request.
ibis-info@eda.org
To obtain general information about IBIS, to ask specific questions
for individual response, and to inquire about joining the EIA-IBIS
Open Forum as a full Member.
ibis@eda.org
To send a message to the general IBIS Open Forum Reflector. This
is used mostly for IBIS Standardization business and future IBIS
technical enhancements. Job posting information is not permitted.
ibis-users@eda.org
To send a message to the IBIS Users' Group Reflector. This is
used mostly for IBIS clarification, current modeling issues, and
general user concerns. Job posting information is not permitted.
ibischk-bug@eda.org
To report ibischk2/3 parser bugs. The Bug Report Form Resides on
eda.org in /pub/ibis/bugs/ibischk/bugform.txt along with reported bugs.
To report s2ibis, s2ibis2 and s2iplt bugs, use the Bug Report Forms
which reside under eda.org in /pub/ibis/bugs/s2ibis/bugs2i.txt,
/pub/ibis/bugs/s2ibis2/bugs2i2.txt, & /pub/ibis/bugs/s2iplt/bugsplt.txt
respectively.
Information on IBIS technical contents, IBIS participants, and actual
IBIS models are available on the IBIS Home page found by selecting the
Electronic Information Group under:
Check the pub/ibis directory on eda.org for more information on previous
discussions and results. You can get on via FTP anonymous.
==============================================================================
Received on Tue Jun 29 09:14:56 1999
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 03 2011 - 09:52:30 PDT