Syed, Scott, I renamed that ugly subject line of mine... and would like to respond to this quick quote from Scott: > ...that the implied assumption that AMS modeling will somehow solve > all of our IBIS modeling problems is sorely mistaken. I will take that blame on myself, because I feel quite optimistic about AMS these days, and may have said things that come across that way. I would like to ask Scott, please give some examples for why not. Or can I take your next sentence as an example? > Interaction between the silicon and that pesky passive > interconnect must be dealt with simultaneously, if we are to believe > that our simulation results have true high-fidelity to measured > results. Why would this not be solvable by writing models with *-AMS? The way I see it, this is really just up to the model writer what they characterize and how it is written up in the *-AMS model. It doesn't seem to be a language limitation to me. Am I missing something? Arpad ------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, email majordomo@eda.org |with the appropriate command message(s) in the body: | | help | subscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | subscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | |or email a request to ibis-request@eda.org. | |IBIS reflector archives exist under: | | http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/email/ E-mail since 1993Received on Mon Apr 4 11:09:31 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 04 2005 - 11:11:28 PDT