RE: [IBIS] *-AMS modeling and hurting companies?

Syed,

Notice I said "(or equivalents)"...
But you are right, this will probably
be a major issue to work out.

Arpad
======================================

-----Original Message-----
From: Syed Huq [mailto:shuq@cisco.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 3:17 PM
To: Muranyi, Arpad
Cc: ibis
Subject: RE: [IBIS] *-AMS modeling and hurting companies?

We talk of HSPICE as if it is a non-commercial tool. If we make the
HSPICE EFGH elements available within IBIS, what about:

PSPICE
RSPICE
NSPICE
KSPICE
QSPICE
..
..
(add more as you see fit)

- Syed

On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 14:45, Muranyi, Arpad wrote:
> Lynne,
> 
> Don't proposal for macromodeling is without the [External Circuit]
> as far as I understand.  He was suggesting to make the HSPICE EFGH
> elements (or equivalents) available as part of the legacy IBIS spec,
> so that the good old IBIS 2.1 IV/Vt curve engine could be ornamented
> by it.
> 
> C/C++ ?!?!?  You didn't have enough of the AMS discussion yet?   :-)
> 
> Arpad
> ====================================================================

-----------------------------------------------------------------
|For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, email majordomo@eda.org
|with the appropriate command message(s) in the body:
|
|  help
|  subscribe   ibis       <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  subscribe   ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  unsubscribe ibis       <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different>
|
|or email a request to ibis-request@eda.org.
|
|IBIS reflector archives exist under:
|
|  http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/  Recent
|  http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/  Recent
|  http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/email/          E-mail since 1993