RE: [IBIS] IBIS Summit Minutes (July 25, 2006)

Hi Michael,

A couple of minor corrections to mine as well:

>>a beta simulation tool constructed
The tools that run the measurement model (ICX, ICX Pro Explorer, and
HyperLynx) are in production (in the case of ICX, have been in
production for over 3 years). There is no Beta involved.

>>>A key limitation of the algorithm shown
Not sure "key" is the right word here.  In retrospect, I probably
shouldn't have mentioned this at all.  The code can easily be made
completely IEEE-1076.1 compliant by having the model user to specify a
time-step.  The issue was mentioned so the same presentation could be
used at the VHDL-AMS meeting.  

>>>overshoot, undershoot and various edge rate parameters
and Slew-rate de-rated setup and hold timing.  


Gary




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ibis@server.eda-stds.org
[mailto:owner-ibis@server.eda-stds.org] On Behalf Of Mirmak, Michael
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 5:14 PM
To: Dodd, Ian; ibis@server.eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: [IBIS] IBIS Summit Minutes (July 25, 2006)

Ian,

Thank you for the correction.  This has been noted and will considered
at the next minutes review during the August 25 teleconference.

- Michael Mirmak
  Intel Corp.
  Chair, EIA IBIS Open Forum 

-----Original Message-----
From: Dodd, Ian [mailto:ian_dodd@mentor.com]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 15:08
To: Mirmak, Michael; ibis@server.eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: [IBIS] IBIS Summit Minutes (July 25, 2006)

Michael,

I feel that you miss-quoted me in the discussion on efficiency of
S-parameter implementations.


Ian Dodd noted that some S-parameter convolution implementations do not
necessarily use a fixed timestep.  Some debate ensued whether the use of
a variable timestep approach is to increase accuracy or simulation
speed.

I feel this should read:


Ian Dodd noted that some S-parameter implementations do not necessarily
use either convolution or a fixed timestep.  Some debate ensued whether
the use of a variable timestep approach is to increase accuracy or
simulation speed. 

Thanks

Ian

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ibis@server.eda-stds.org
[mailto:owner-ibis@server.eda-stds.org] On Behalf Of Mirmak, Michael
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 3:41 PM
To: ibis@server.eda-stds.org
Subject: [IBIS] IBIS Summit Minutes (July 25, 2006)

Attached are the minutes of the Tuesday, July 25, 2006 IBIS Open Forum
Summit.

- Michael Mirmak
  Intel Corp.
  Chair, EIA IBIS Open Forum

--------------------------------------------------------------------
|For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, e-mail majordomo@eda-stds.org 
|with the appropriate command message(s) in the body:
|
|  help
|  subscribe   ibis       <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  subscribe   ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  unsubscribe ibis       <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different>
|
|or e-mail a request to ibis-request@eda-stds.org.
|
|IBIS reflector archives exist under:
|
|  http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/ Recent  
| http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/ Recent
|  http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email/         E-mail since 1993

--------------------------------------------------------------------
|For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, e-mail majordomo@eda-stds.org
|with the appropriate command message(s) in the body:
|
|  help
|  subscribe   ibis       <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  subscribe   ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  unsubscribe ibis       <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different>
|
|or e-mail a request to ibis-request@eda-stds.org.
|
|IBIS reflector archives exist under:
|
|  http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/ Recent
|  http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/ Recent
|  http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email/         E-mail since 1993