====================================================================== IBIS INTERCONNECT TASK GROUP http://www.eda.org/ibis/interconnect_wip/ Mailing list: ibis-interconnect@freelists.org Archives at http://www.freelists.org/archive/ibis-interconn/ ====================================================================== Attendees from October 7 Meeting (* means attended) ANSYS Curtis Clark Cadence Design Systems Bradley Brim Cisco David Siadat Intel Corp. Michael Mirmak* Keysight Technologies Radek Biernacki Mentor Graphics Arpad Muranyi* Micron Technology Justin Butterfield*, Randy Wolff* Signal Integrity Software Walter Katz*, Mike LaBonte* Teraspeed Labs Bob Ross* University of Aveiro in Portugal Wael Dghais No patents were declared. During opens, Randy Wolff noted that e-mail problems caused issues with distribution of the minutes he took. Michael Mirmak will send the minutes to the reflector. Mike LaBonte moved to defer minutes consideration until next time. Randy seconded. The motion carried without objection. Walter Katz noted that he has a presentation in progress. Mike’s drawings will be updated later, as he has not finalized his revisions to them. Bob Ross noted that he is withdrawing his EPEPS presentation. However, he will present some drawings during this meeting. Walter reviewed his slides, providing several examples of pin, and terminal usage; not all the examples have pads. His update to the BIRD uses draft 23 as a baseline and incorporates drawings. He noted that the association pin_rail signal_name shows that all signals are shorted on the pin side. The second and third column of Begin/End Interconnect Model section use reserved names. Pins listed under [Pin] using the same signal name means they are connected. Michael asked what to do about different model_names with a shared signal_name. Walter replied that a signal_name is a data book name. Randy asked what is applied to PU_ref and PD_ref in the absence of a connection. Walter answered that one should assume Voltage Range & GND connections. Bob added that one could assume an external voltage; it’s sometimes hard to tell. Walter to post his examples via Mike LaBonte. Arpad Muranyi asked whether the rules shown are actually spelled out in the documentation. Walter confirmed they word. Bob presented his updated drawings, which Mike will post to the website.. Michael will start editing Draft 23 (now with Terminal improvements) for clarification and readability; this draft 24 will be the discussion topic next time. Bob noted that the document might need additional text to clarify subtleties. Walter added that verification would be needed, using at least 9 cases for testing. Bob noted that the document needs to settle on notation; for example, a “Bus Model” keyword may be contradictory. He added that we have deferred issues to consider yet, such as filename conventions, separate interconnect files vs. embedded (in-line) data, etc.