From: ibis-interconn-bounce@freelists.org On Behalf Of Randy Wolff (Redacted sender "rrwolff" for DMARC) Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 1:34 PM To: ibis-interconn@freelists.org Subject: [ibis-interconn] BIRD189.6 minor editorial Just noticed a minor editorial fix for BIRD189.6. On page 28, the sentence “Each IBIS-ISS terminal shall have terminal line entry.” needs to say “have a terminal”. Randy From: ibis-interconn-bounce@freelists.org On Behalf Of radek_biernacki@keysight.com Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 2:16 AM To: michael.mirmak@intel.com; ibis-interconn@freelists.org Subject: [ibis-interconn] Re: BIRD189.6 proposed change one-page document Michael, Sorry for a last minute comment, but doing a final review I think we have another editorial issue (not just one but all similar). They are all related to some statements referring to “Touchstone”. For example, statements like “connections to IBIS-ISS subcircuits or Touchstone files” are not up to the high professional standard of the IBIS specification language. Touchstone files are not electrical components and the connections are made to the n-port components for which data is provided in Touchstone files. I am sending this to the Interconnect list instead of ibis@freelists.org to avoid the last minute controversy. Yet, we need to mention that some cleanup, including improving consistency should be done by the editorial task group. Radek