Hello, I hope I am adressing the right forum with this. If not, please excuse my intrusion. I have been making a number of IBIS models for microcontrollers of medium complexity, successfully as it looks. As I will soon take on more complex products, with purely analog parts, I have been considering the "correct" way of modeling a truly analog IO (if at all). Clearly, to include the power clamps I should treat it as an input. On the other hand this might not be the correct procedure, maybe it would be better to treat it as a power/ground pin? It would certainly mean less work. A third option is to ignore it altogether (NA). Any comment/feedback on this issue would be most welcome. Best regards, Lars Snith -- o---------------------------------------o | Lars Snith | | Senior Design Engineer | | AVR Products | | ..................................... | | Atmel Norway | | Vestre Rosten 79, 7075 Tiller, NORWAY | | ..................................... | | E-mail: lsnith@atmel.com | | Phone direct: +47 72 89 76 09 | | Switch board: +47 72 88 43 88 | | Fax: +47 72 88 43 99 | | ..................................... | | Atmel home page: http://www.atmel.com | o---------------------------------------o () Join the ASCII ribbon campaign against /\ html email and Microsoft attachments. |------------------------------------------------------------------ |For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, email majordomo@eda.org |with just the appropriate command message(s) in the body: | | help | subscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | subscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | |or email a written request to ibis-request@eda.org. | |IBIS reflector archives exist under: | | http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/email/ E-mail since 1993Received on Mon Aug 15 23:24:26 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 15 2005 - 23:35:35 PDT