RE: [IBIS] [IBIS-Users] Differential Output terminals

Fabio,
 
You will have to make one [Model] and associate
that model with both pins using the [Diff Pin]
keyword, and the tools will provide the correct
stimulus to both model instances for you
automatically.
 
Arpad
=================================================

________________________________

From: Fabio BRINA [mailto:fabio.brina@st.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 2:00 AM
To: Muranyi, Arpad; ibis-users@server.eda.org; ibis@server.eda.org
Subject: RE: [IBIS] [IBIS-Users] Differential Output terminals


Thank you Arpad,
 
so is a task of the tool to make the inversion
of inverting Pin, clear, so I have only to 
characterize the non-inverting output 
(I haven't asymmetric structure).
Thanks,
 
Fabio

________________________________

From: owner-ibis@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-ibis@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 4:10 PM
To: ibis-users@server.eda.org; ibis@server.eda.org
Subject: RE: [IBIS] [IBIS-Users] Differential Output terminals


Fabio,
 
There is no reason to make two [Model]s with the
same data in them for a differential pair.  You
might as well just have one [Model] and call it
twice for the diff pair.  The inversion will be
taken care of automatically by the tool for you.
 
The only reason you might need to consider two
[Model]s is if the buffer has asymmetric 
characteristics between the two outputs in its
behavior.
 
Arpad
=================================================

________________________________

From: owner-ibis@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-ibis@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Fabio BRINA
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 7:22 AM
To: ibis-users@server.eda.org; ibis@server.eda.org
Subject: [IBIS] [IBIS-Users] Differential Output terminals


Hello ibis experts,
 
I'm in the modeling of a "fully differential driver"
structure, do you think I have to consider the 
same model for both output terminals?
(I see many differential model in this way)
 
[Pin]
...
11   DOUT3-    OUTMOD
12   DOUT3+    OUTMOD
...
 
or is better to consider two model for the two output?
 
[Pin]
...
11   DOUT3-    OUTMINUS
12   DOUT3+    OUTPLUS
...
 
(in this case the [Pulldown] table of OUTMINUS have the 
 same points od [Pullup] table of OUTPLUS and viceversa?)
 
Many thanks,
Regards,
 
Fabio Brina

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
|For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, e-mail majordomo@eda-stds.org
|with the appropriate command message(s) in the body:
|
|  help
|  subscribe   ibis       <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  subscribe   ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  unsubscribe ibis       <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different>
|
|or e-mail a request to ibis-request@eda-stds.org.
|
|IBIS reflector archives exist under:
|
|  http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/ Recent
|  http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/ Recent
|  http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email/         E-mail since 1993