RE: [IBIS-Users] RE: [IBIS] input signal for model usage

From: Lance Wang <lwang_at_.....>
Date: Tue Mar 17 2009 - 13:05:13 PDT
Fabio,

 

There is another situation could be for the second point.

 

Sometimes, when you compare the waveforms from Spice transistor-level
simulations or measurements and waveforms that from the IBIS model
simulations, you will find the differences. It could be happened that you
are using faster input clock frequency. The reason is that IBIS model has
the limitations or say your IBIS simulator has the limitations. 

 

So Arpad is right, you can not fix it for recapturing the VT curves. But
sometimes it doesn't mean you buffer can not handle this kind of clock
frequency. It could be just the limitations of your IBIS model or
simulators.

 

Regards,

 

Lance Wang

978-764-2298

IO Methodology Inc.

 

  _____  

From: owner-ibis-users@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-ibis-users@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 12:16 PM
To: ibis-users@server.eda.org; ibis@server.eda.org
Subject: RE: [IBIS-Users] RE: [IBIS] input signal for model usage

 

Fabio,

 

You are correct on the first one, and almost correct

on the second.

 

1)  The edge rate of the stimulus to an IBIS model will

not change its output edge rate, but it will shift it,

depending on how the tool implements the threshold on

the stimulus input of the IBIS model.  This is not related

to the IBIS Vinh and Vinl (or related) parameters.  The

IBIS specification doesn't say anything about how the

threshold of the input stimulus should be detected by 

the IBIS model implementation.

 

2)  If you clock the IBIS model faster than the V-t curve

can handle it you would need to make a new model, but not

only a new model, but also a new chip.  The fact that a

V-t curve goes only so fast indicates that the chip itself

can't go faster.  So no matter how hard you try to make a

new set of V-t curves, you won't succeed unless you redesign

the chip itself...

 

Arpad

=============================================================

 

  _____  

From: owner-ibis@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-ibis@server.eda.org] On Behalf
Of Fabio BRINA
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 8:00 AM
To: 'Muniswara Reddy Vorugu'; ibis-users@server.eda.org; ibis@server.eda.org
Subject: RE: [IBIS-Users] RE: [IBIS] input signal for model usage

 

Thank you Muniswar,

 

 could you confirm (or correct) these propositions? :

 

 - if I change only rise/fall slew at the input (A_in as you say)

   the Output response is the same. (could be only a little shift time in
the Output?)

 

 - if I change the input clock frequency (fck), the Output response is
correct

   until fck is under the frequency used in the V-T tables generation.

   (if I want to use an higher clock frequency, I have to generate a new
model

    with differents V-T tables)

 

 are that right?

 

 many thanks,

 

 Fabio

 

 

 

  _____  

From: owner-ibis-users@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-ibis-users@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Muniswara Reddy Vorugu
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 12:00 PM
To: Fabio BRINA; ibis-users@server.eda.org; ibis@server.eda.org
Subject: [IBIS-Users] RE: [IBIS] input signal for model usage

Hi,

The OUTPUT of I/O ( IBIS model)  does not depend on the Rise/Fall slew at
the input of I/O ( say A_in ).

 

If you mean. Can you have different  LOW/HIGH duration? 

You can give different clock/pulse frequency, but there is an upper limit of
the clock.

The upper limit of the clock frequency is limited by the duration of the V-T
tables/Ramp time.

 

Thanks,

Muniswar

 

From: owner-ibis@eda.org [mailto:owner-ibis@eda.org] On Behalf Of Fabio
BRINA
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:55 PM
To: ibis-users@eda.org; ibis@eda.org
Subject: [IBIS] input signal for model usage

 

Hello IBIS experts, 

 

 Once an IBIS model has been created, can be used in different Input speeds?

 

 In other words: if I consider an I/O model, Can I use every input Pulse
with

 several rise/fall time Or I have to use only the same pulse used in the 

 model creations?

 

I hope is clear what I mean.

 

Thanks,

Fabio

 

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by  <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 

 

-- 
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
information in any medium. Thank you. 
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by  <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by  <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by  <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



--------------------------------------------------------------------
|For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, e-mail majordomo@eda-stds.org
|with the appropriate command message(s) in the body:
|
|  help
|  subscribe   ibis       <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  subscribe   ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  unsubscribe ibis       <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different>
|
|or e-mail a request to ibis-request@eda-stds.org.
|
|IBIS reflector archives exist under:
|
|  http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/ Recent
|  http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/ Recent
|  http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email/         E-mail since 1993
Received on Tue Mar 17 13:07:43 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 17 2009 - 13:08:41 PDT