Dear Tom and Lynne,
Thanks very much! Your replies help me understand IBIS much better.
Actually I am trying to compare the transient simulation (voltage vs. time)
result of the IBIS model of an inverter with its PSPICE model. I connect the
inverter with a high value resistor and varying the rise/fall time of the
input pulse.
In my expectation, as the rise/fall time increases and other pulse values
unchanged, the difference between the two models in rise/fall time should be
smaller.However the result shows opposite. And this result is got by only
taking the IBIS output buffer. Thus, I doubt whether there are something
wrong with my circuit connection or anything else.
Thanks and regards,
Ji
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Lynne D. Green <lgreen22@mindspring.com>wrote:
> Hello, Ji,
>
> It is not clear exactly what you wish to accomplish with your simulation.
>
> Some things to consider about IBIS buffer models:
> * Input buffer has ONE pin (its input). No output pin. So the input can
> never
> "drive" an output buffer. That is why (as Tom pointed out) there is no
> delay
> information for input buffers.
> * Output buffer has ONE pin (its output pin). While it is possible to
> use DATA as an analog input, a deeper knowledge of the simulator would
> be helpful. For example, some SI simulators use a threshold crossing
> to begin the output toggle, so there is no "transfer function".
> * Load determines the time it will actually take to complete the toggle at
> the output pin.
> Interconnects (traces) on boards are transmission lines and are resistive
> rather than capacitive.
> Interconnects on chips are also transmission lines, but tend to be
> capacitive.
>
> If, on the other hand, you are comparing an IBIS buffer with the netlist it
> was
> created from, that is much easier. One applies the same load to the two
> units
> and compares the simulation results. For the load used to create the
> model,
> the two simulation results should match.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Lynne
>
>
> "IBIS training when you need it, where you need it."
>
> Dr. Lynne Green
> Green Streak Programs
> http://www.greenstreakprograms.com
> 425-788-0412
> lgreen22@mindspring.com
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-ibis-users@eda.org [mailto:owner-ibis-users@eda.org] *On
> Behalf Of *ji xiao
>
>>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 11:35 PM
>> *To:* tom@teraspeed.com
>> *Cc:* ibis-users@eda.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [IBIS-Users] question about IBIS simulation for a complete
>> inverter
>>
>>
>> Dear Tom,
>>
>> I agree with your statement that there is no description of the logic
>> function in IBIS model. Then, if I just want to compare the IBIS simulation
>> result of a complete inverter with its PSPICE simulation result, do I need
>> to simulate the output model only or cascade the IBIS input model with the
>> output model? It seems that the cascading way will be closer to the PSPICE
>> result, but I am not sure. I just directly treat the output signal of the
>> input model as the input signal of the output model.
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>>
>>
>> Ji Yuancheng
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Tom Dagostino <tom@teraspeed.com<mailto:
>> tom@teraspeed.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Ji
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -------------------------------------------------------------------- |For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, e-mail majordomo@eda-stds.org |with the appropriate command message(s) in the body: | | help | subscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | subscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | |or e-mail a request to ibis-request@eda-stds.org. | |IBIS reflector archives exist under: | | http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email/ E-mail since 1993Received on Fri Mar 19 11:55:06 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 19 2010 - 11:56:43 PDT