Howdy,
I don't know how clear it was at the meeting, but I wanted to
again point out the article in EDN which I believe is
pertinent to IBIS. Please reference "Treat pc-board traces as
transmission lines to specify drive buffers", EDN Sept. 2 1993
page 129.
The article shows that the best way to design/qualify a buffer
for proper AC operation is by referencing its V/I curve (and
not its DC sink current). Furthermore, it's the best way to
achieve similar drive capabilities across various vendors and
processes (a concept I've been able to convince Intel of as we
create "compatible" chipsets and processors). For the first
time (that I'm aware of) it's quite clear what's meant by a
"PCI driver."
All of us probably would have seen a lot less manufacturing
problems if "LS" or "F" parts were equated through their V/I
curves rather than "24mA", "64mA", or some such nonsense,
across vendors.
And yes, I'm aware that this doesn't work with certain types
of buffers (which we feel are handled by T/V/I). But I think
it's a good start if people begin looking at where dynamic
performance really comes from. And for IBIS, the data and
methods are akin to the underlying structure.
Comments?
Don Telian
Received on Thu Sep 16 09:43:36 1993
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 03 2011 - 09:52:28 PDT