Re[2]: C_COMP etc.

Text item:

Kumar,

You wrote:

2. If the v-t is primarily performed by measurement, then the effective
parasitics should include both the package and the die parasitic. In
this case it makes sense to lump them into smallest set of efffective
parameters like c_dut, l_dut etc. Then the v-t data is explicit with
all the conditions of its generation specified. There are no implicit
quantities like c_comp to account for.

I do not agree completely with this, because you have to consider that some dies
come in different packages. The die remains the same (so does C_comp) but the
package L,R,C may change drastically, which in turn effects wave forms (V-T)
also. For this reason I would keep them separate.

Arpad

Text item: External Message Header

The following mail header is for administrative use
and may be ignored unless there are problems.

***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***.

Subject: Re: C_COMP etc.
To: ibis@vhdl.org
Message-Id: <9412081526.AA13375@hot>
From: cpk@cadence.com (C. Kumar)
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 94 10:26:18 -0500
Received: by hot (5.65+/1.5)
        id AA13375; Thu, 8 Dec 94 10:26:18 -0500
Received: from hot by cadence.Cadence.COM (5.61/3.14)
        id AA24677; Thu, 8 Dec 94 07:25:11 -0800
Received: from cadence.cadence.com(158.140.18.1) by mailgate.cadence.com via sma
        id sma004433; Thu Dec 8 07:26:26 1994
Received: (from smap@localhost) by mailgate.Cadence.COM (8.6.8/8.6.8) id HAA0444
Received: from mailgate.Cadence.COM by vhdl.vhdl.org (4.1/SMI-4.1/BARRNet)
        id AA04081; Thu, 8 Dec 94 07:31:13 PST
Received: from vhdl.vhdl.org by hermes.intel.com (5.65/10.0i); Thu, 8 Dec 94 07:
Received: from hermes.intel.com by relay.jf.intel.com with smtp
        (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0rFl4q-000twfC; Thu, 8 Dec 94 07:48 PST
Received on Thu Dec 8 15:14:41 1994