I believe this refers to our old discussion about component centered versus
buffer (pin) centered representation. I agree that there is a case for
organizing data on a buffer centric basis but we have no provisions for it now. May be we can reopen this discussion.
>
> Dear Ibisians,
> Could anyone help me with a simple query ?
> The IBIS models I have seen all contain a mapping from pins to
> driver/receiver models which are then defined in the same file.
> It is, however, sometimes desirable to define this mapping directly in a
> component library. Is it reasonable to allow specification of the
> driver/receiver model name directly on the pins in the library as an
> alternative to referencing the models at the component level, or could
> there be a name clash with another model using the same name for a
> different characteristic ?
> Presumably, this could be overcome by also specifying the model at the
> component level, but what if none exists but we want to specify a driver
> model at the pin level which is defined somewhere else ?
>
> Thank you in advance for your anticipated help.
>
> John
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
> John
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> John Berrie, Chief Application Engineer
> Zuken-Redac Limited,
> Green Lane,Tewkesbury,
> Glos. GL20 8HE, England
> Tel: (44) 0684 294161
> Fax:(44) 0684 299754
> E-Mail johnb@redact.co.uk
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
Received on Thu Feb 9 06:47:44 1995
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 03 2011 - 09:52:28 PDT