>> So, basically, I don't see why SPICE is not sufficiently "overlapping
>>and redundant." It's a lot MORE information than the simulator will
>>probably ever need. The existing matrix descriptions are probably equally
>>expressive, since they permit "full" or "sparse" coupling as needed.
I want to use a format that "lends" itself to easy partioning. If people believe
that a 100 element SUBCKT does this, then we should use it. If however, people
feel that a different format would be either easier to create or easier to interpret,
then we should use that.
>> Jon Powell's comment is totally accurate:
but thanks for agreeing with me, I think.
jon
Received on Mon May 8 12:53:21 1995
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 03 2011 - 09:52:29 PDT