New package model proposal by Steven Peters

From: Jon Powell <uunet!qdt.com!jonp@uunet.uu.net>
Date: Wed May 10 1995 - 14:47:01 PDT

I must agree with Fred Vance.

The description of the PCB portion of a SIMM is an IBIS issue. If INTEL was
putting the P7 on a SIMM I sure everyone at INTEL would agree. ;)

Of course, whether or not we need to address this issue with this current EGG is
a very good question.

jon
Received on Wed May 10 22:24:51 1995

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Arpad Muranyi: "MCMs and SIMMs, etc... in IBIS"
Previous message: kellee@nwlink.com: "Adding a PCB like format to IBIS"
In reply to: Arpad Muranyi: "Re: New package model proposal by Steven Peters"
Maybe reply: Chrisopher E. Reid: "Re: New package model proposal by Steven Peters"
Maybe reply: Stephen Peters: "Re[2]: New package model proposal by Steven Peters"
Maybe reply: Arpad Muranyi: "Re: New package model proposal by Steven Peters"
Maybe reply: Fred Vance: "Re: New package model proposal by Steven Peters"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 03 2011 - 09:52:29 PDT