EIA IBIS Summit Meeting minutes

From: Guy de Burgh <guy@camarillo.viewlogic.com>
Date: Tue Jun 13 2000 - 14:42:13 PDT

Date: 6/13/00

SUBJECT: 6/8/00 EIA IBIS Summit Meeting

VOTING MEMBERS AND 2000 PARTICIPANTS LIST:
3Com Roy Leventhal
Agilent (EEsof, etc.) Mark Chang
Applied Simulation Technology Raj Raghuram, Norio Matsui, Fred Balistreri*
Avanti Nikolai Bannov
Cadence Design Mike LaBonte*, Todd Westerhoff, Ian Dodd*,
                               Donald Telian, Patrick Dos Santos
Cisco Systems Syed Huq*, Irfan Elahi, John Fisher
Compaq [Bob Haller], Peter LaFlamme, Ron Bellomio,
                               Shafier Rahman, Doug Burns
Cypress (Rajesh Manapat)
EMC Corporation (Fabrizio Zanella),
Fairchild Semiconductor Craig Klem
HyperLynx (& Pads Software) Matthew Flora*, Kellee Crisafulli*, Gene Garat,
                               John Angulo*, Al Davis*, Lynne Green
IBM Michael Cohen*, Greg Edlund, Jerry Hayes*
Innoveda (Viewlogic Systems) Chris Rokusek*, Guy de Burgh*, Jun Tian,
                               Cary Mandel, Brad Griffin, (Jon Powell)
Intel Corporation Stephen Peters*, Arpad Muranyi*, Will Hobbs,
                               Richard Mellitz, Charles Phares*, Meir Nakar*,
                               Sigeti Gabi*
LSI Logic (Larry Barnes)
Mentor Graphics (& Veribest) Bob Ross*, Tom Dagostino*, Malcolm Ash,
                               Kim Owen, Jean Oudinot, Sherif Hammad*,
                               Hazam Hegazy, Weston Beal*, Ken Bakalar*
Mitsubishi Shahab Ahmed, Carleen Murphy*
Molex Incorporated Gus Panella
Motorola Ron Werner
National Semiconductor Milt Schwartz*
North East Systems Associates Edward Sayre, Tony Sinker
Nortel Networks Steve Coe, Calvin Trowell, Hassan Ali
Philips Semiconductor D.C. Sessions, Todd Andersen*
  (& VLSI Technology)
Quantic EMC (Mike Ventham)
Siemens AG Bernhard Unger, Gerald Bannert
SiQual Scott McMorrow, Wis Macomson
Texas Instruments Stephen Nolan, Ramzi Ammar, Mac McCaughey,
                               Thomas Fisher*, Jean-Claude Perrin,
                               Jean-Yves Oberle
Time Domain Analysis Systems Dima Smolyansky, Steven Corey
Tyco Electronics (AMP) (Russell Moser)
Via Technologies (Weber Chuang)
Zuken (& Incases) Werner Rissiek, John Berrie*

OTHER PARTICIPANTS IN 2000:
Actel Corp. Silvia Montoya
Advansis Mikio Kiyono
Aerospatiale Matra CCR Lionel Dreux, Julien Boullie
Alcatel (Lannion, Bell) Daniel Peron, Steven Criel
Brocade Communications Robert Badal
ECI Telecom Daniel Adar*
EIA Cecilia Fleming*
Fraunhofer Institute Michael Kurten
Jet Propulsion Lab John Treichlew
Hewlett Packard Paul Gregory
Rockwell Collins Ron Hau
Signals & Systems Engineering Tom Hawkins
ST Micorelectronics Fabrice Boissiere, Pierre Saintot
Sun Microsystems Victor Chang*
Thomson-CSF Savenrio Lerose, Pascal Vaslin, Thierry Zak,
                               Sylvie Lasserre
Transfer Hans Klos, Wilco Hamhuis
Xilinx, Inc. Susan Wu
Independent, Consultant Hideki Fukuda*

In the list above, attendees at the meeting are indicated by *. Principal
members or other active members who have not attended are in parentheses.
Participants who no longer are in the organization are in square brackets.

Upcoming Meetings: The bridge numbers for future IBIS teleconferences are as
follows:

  Date Bridge Number Reservation # Passcode
  June 30, 2000 (916) 356-9200 6-234927 9698213
  July 21, 2000 (916) 356-9200 6-234828 2232822
  August 11, 2000 (916) 356-9200 6-234930 7474775

All meetings are 8:00 AM to 9:55 AM Pacific Time. We try to have agendas out
7 days before each Open Forum and meeting minutes out within 7 days after.
When you call into the meeting, ask for the IBIS Open Forum hosted by Will
Hobbs and give the reservation number and passcode.

NOTE: "AR" = Action Required.

-------------------------------- MINUTES -------------------------------------

INTRODUCTIONS
The IBIS Summit Meeting was held in Los Angeles, California the day after the
trade show portion of the Design Automation Conference (DATE 2000) at the
Hyatt Regency Hotel. The EIA IBIS Open Forum sponsored the meeting, lunch,
and refreshments through membership funding.

About 31 people representing 17 organizations participated. Bob Ross welcomed
the participants. Everyone introduced him/herself. Semiconductor vendors, EDA
vendors and users of EDA tools and IBIS models were represented. (Also,
thanks to Cecilia Fleming and Guy de Burgh for handling the administrative and
registration details.)

All of the presentations and meeting documentation will be uploaded at

  http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/summits/jun00/

The notes below give only some of the content and discussion.

IBIS REPORT
Bob Ross, Mentor Graphics
Bob Ross introduced the general topics of the meeting. They consisted of

  Business and election of officers
  Connector specification discussion
  Future activities and ideas
  Other discussions

Bob then gave a general status report. The EIA IBIS Open Forum continues to
be active since 1993. It has 31 official members and about 350 to 400 people
on the e-mail reflectors. The accomplishments for the previous year include
releasing ANSI/EIA-656-A (IBIS Version 3.2), the ibischk3 parser. Also, the
Accuracy Handbook was uploaded and the Connector Specification was released
to the IBIS Open Forum for further work. These projects were initiated by the
IBIS Users Group.

The current IBIS projects include working on the Connector Specification,
producing an IBIS Version 4.0 upgrade, and also working on a future version
of IBIS. In addition the Open Forum monitors and works with other committees
regarding IMIC, EMI, and JEDEC activities.

Bob briefly summaries some of the future work. Bob then discussed the impact
of IBIS. About 35 semiconductor vendors supply IBIS models from company Web
links, and others directly through sales channels for an estimated 2,000
IBIS models. About 10-12 commercial IBIS vendors exist, amounting to over
11,000 IBIS models. Users also produce IBIS models and internal IBIS
specifications and guidelines. Approximately 10 EDA vendors (behavioral and
Spice) read IBIS models. Free and commercial IBIS tools are available. IBIS
IBIS is frequently referenced in publications. Bob concluded that IBIS is
well established.

VHDL-AMS AND VERILOG-AMS, A DUAL TUTORIAL
Ken Bakalar, Mentor Graphics
Ken Bakalar, an active member of the VHDL-AMS and pending Verilog-AMS
standardization activities, presented a general overview based on a full
tutorial that normally would take longer to deliver. The full tutorial
will be uploaded and covers much more detail than can be presented here.

Ken defined a "Digital Simulator", "Analog Simulator", and a "Mixed-Signal
Simulator" (AMS) and its partitioning into analog and digital elements and the
synchronization between simulators. Ken gave a time-line and genealogy of
the AMS activities.

Both V*-AMS languages have these features (described in detail in the
presentation):

  Extended structural semantics
  Mixed-signal simulation
  Continuous modeling extensions
  Frequency domain support
  Simulation control

VHDL-AMS has these extras:

  Handling of initial conditions and discontinuities
  Mixed-signal initialization well defined
  Sequential or equation-based notation
  Sound mathematical foundations based on differential algebraic equation
    theory
  Formal definition

Verilog-AMS has these extras:

  Automatic converter insertion at discrete/continuous boundaries
  Automatic resolution of signal flow/conservative connections
  Many built-in special case mechanisms
  Equation formulation uses controlled source notation
  Verilog VPI extension included
  Informal definition - users's manual

Ken presented a diode sample in each language. (People raised some questions
on details, and there are some editorial errors in the examples.) The
uploaded presentations describe more structural details of both VHDL-AMS and
Verilog-AMS. Ken closed with two examples, one describing piecewise defined
behavior and the other describing sample and hold.

Several questions and discussions occurred during the presentation. One dealt
with whether there existed a Spice to HDL and HDL to Spice path. (This
was not clarified.) Ken responded to Arpad Muranyi that table based data
could be handled. Ken responded to Chris Rokusek that partitioning of
matrices for optimization could be done for ground plane analysis.

Ian Dodd commented on possible convergence problems and that the initial
value problem was not solved. Ken stated that there is no visibility of
the time step, and this is good.

Ken differentiated VHDL-AMS as concurrent (order does not matter) versus
Verilog-AMS as sequential.

MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS
Bob Ross reported that the official ANSI/EIA-656-A in Acrobat format for IBIS
Version 3.2 can be found at:

  http://www.eia.org/eng/standards/default.htm

Bob reported on several recent articles that reference IBIS models. "Ensuring
Signal Integrity" by Jon Powell has an IBIS sidebar and appears in the June
2000 issue of Printed Circuit Design, pp. 12 -16 & 24. Also, "Signal
Integrity Tips Ensure FPGA Designers Meet Critical Market Windows" by Lynne
Green and Rick Ballantyne in the May 29, 2000 issue of Electronic Design,
pp. 97-100 mention IBIS. A link to the article is:

  http://www.elecdesign.com/magazine/2000/may2900/desapps/1DESAPP1.shtml

Bob reported that STMicroelectronics has Flash Memory IBIS Models at:

  http://www.eu.st.com/stonline/products/support/memory/flash/ibis.htm

Stephen Peters raised the issue of SPAM mail on the IBIS reflectors. This
was discussed briefly. The way to deal with it would be with a majordomo
based list which allows only list members to send e-mail on the reflectors.

The following officers received thank you recognition plaques presented by
Bob Ross and Stephen Peters for their service and contributions during the
1999 - 2000 year:

  Chair, Bob Ross, Mentor Graphics
  Vice Chair, Stephen Peters, Intel
  Secretary, Guy de Burgh, Innoveda
  Postmaster, Matthew Flora, HyperLynx
  Web Master, Syed Huq, Cisco Systems
  Librarian, Jon Powell, Innoveda

ELECTION OF IBIS OFFICERS FOR 2000 - 2001
Bob Ross then conducted an election for the 2000 - 2001 EIA IBIS Open Forum
Officers, one position at a time, starting with Chair. Nominations for the
various positions had been previously announced at the May 26, 2000 IBIS
meeting, and Bob called for any additional nominations. For the uncontested
positions, the vote was conducted by a show of hands. For the contested
positions, the candidates gave brief statements. A roll call vote based on
one vote per EIA IBIS Open Forum member company was conducted.

During the election Stephen Peters withdrew for the Chair. position because of
work commitments and an upcoming sabbatical. Michael Cohen was nominated from
the floor for Vice Chair. The vote for Vice Chair. was Stephen 6, Mike 5, and
1 abstention. The Librarian position election was held between previously
nominated candidates, Jon Powell and Mike LaBonte. The vote for Librarian was
Mike 8, Jon 3, and 1 abstention.

The following people have been nominated as officers for 2000 - 2001

  Chair: Bob Ross, Mentor Graphics
  Vice Chair: Stephen Peters, Intel
  Secretary: Guy de Burgh, Innoveda
  Postmaster: John Angulo, HyperLynx
  Webmaster: Syed Huq, Cisco Systems
  Librarian: Mike LaBonte, Cadence

IBIS CONNECTOR SPECIFICATION
Kellee Crisafulli, HyperLynx
Kellee gave reported on the Connector Specification progress. The goal is
still to complete the Specification this year after incorporate the changes
requested at the January 31, 2000 IBIS Summit Meeting and also after
improving some syntax descriptions and explanations. The document will be
issued in Word, Adobe and text formats. A Working Group has been meeting
regularly, the last meeting on June 6, 2000.

Kellee discussed ambiguous syntax changes. Both Lumped and Distributed
formats are now supported, similar to the Electrical Board Description.
However, this is being accomplished differently using a new [Derivation
Method] keyword to indicate a Lumped or Distributed for the matrix section.
Also, a multiplier

  Mult = xxx

(versus Len = xxx) to provides scaling of both the discrete or distributed
sections. There was some discussion regarding whether explicit units are
needed and should be optionally added.

The Swath matrix usage has been further clarified. Now the term "edge only"
is used to designate edge rows or columns that are to be used only at the
edges, and to be terminated by a given impedance when the Swath is positioned
for an internal group of pins. This was discussed and illustrated.

One problem was raised. A smaller x-y swath can be positioned within a
larger X-Y grid such that only the top edge are aligned. It is ambiguous
whether the left and right pins of the top edge swath should be treated as
edge only pins. (Kellee thought that it should, but needs to clarify this.)

Kellee listed other details. The file line lengths were set to a consistent
120 characters and a line continuation character is allowed for model sections
and stubs.

Kellee presented some examples showing the revised syntax. Kellee summarized
the short term goals as

  Finalize the changes
  Vote on Verson 1.0 of .icm
  Ask for funds for parser development
  Update the examples
  Confirm the accuracy by comparing to real connector data, Spice data and
    IBIS Package model data.

Future goals for Version 2.x are

  Add lossy modeling
  Add other topology support such as cross-over pins.

IBIS FUTURES - AN UPDATE
Stephen Peters, Intel Corp.
After lunch, Stephen Peters introduce the IBIS Future discussion topic. The
previous tutorial on VHDL-AMS and Verilog-AMS fell under this general topic.

Stephen reported that the first meeting was a face-to-face meeting held in
March 2000. The goal was to provide a path to a 'next generation' I/O
buffer description language. So far the progress has been slow. Mike LaBonte
will conducting Working Group teleconference meetings while Stephen is on a
sabbatical.

Stephen stated the general requirements:

  Keep the good stuff of IBIS
    Standardized description
    Protect intellectual property
    Document signal integrity parameters
    Continue support of board level (behavioral) simulators

  Expand the format and structure to fix problem areas
    Expandability and flexibility (versus fixed keywords)
    Enable accurate modeling of simultaneous switching outputs, power
      delivery, and package effects
    Support behavioral receivers
    Enable equation descriptions (including S-parameters)

Stephen presented the Issues and Considerations:

  Nodal descriptions are a necessity
    Die interconnect (pad and pin) descriptions
    Power delivery and pin to pin coupling
    Connections for black boxes

  Macro language for creating new model prototypes
    Flexible and extendible and allows existing IBIS model to be reused
    Enables a wide variety of descriptions

  Public Key encryption a necessity??
    Tool vendor specific encryption or
    Public/private key administered by the IBIS Committee

  Use XHML Syntax?

In the discussion segments, people indicated that S-parameters could be
regarded as a possible subset of the general notion of equation based
descriptions. Some comments were made regarding the reliability of encrypted
models. The encryption issue will be treated independently from the IBIS
Futures Working Group discussions.

People cited the advantages of building upon existing standards and formats
versus inventing a new format and also on prototyping the future work.

OVERVIEW OF XML
Mike LaBonte, Cadence Design Systems
Mike LaBonte gave an overview tutorial of XML. He gave these definitions:

  Meta-language:
    SGML Standard Generalized Markup Language
    XML eXtensible Markup Language (subset of SGML)

  Language:
    HTML Hypertext Markup Language
    VML Vector Markup Language

Mike then illustrated XML and XML editing tools. The key points of XML are:

  XML is a simple meta language - a basis for creating languages
  Unrecognized elements are easily ignored, since opening tags are always
    balanced by a closing tag
  Tools for working with XML are common

Part of XML is the Document Type Definition (DTD). Its key points are:

  Hand out a DTD as your file format specification
  XML tools will automatically validate XML content against DTD
  DTD reference can be a URL to the "master" DTD

Mike discussed and illustrated an eXtensible Style Language (XSL). Its key
points are:

  XML data can be converted to HTML, or any other format
  XSL processors are built into browsers
  Report views can be altered by modifying the XSL file, without changing the
    tool that produces the data

Mike listed some XML projects for EDA:

  Silicon Integration Initiative (Si2)
    QuickData - web part searches
    Pinnacles Component Information Standard (PCIS)
    Timing Diagram Markup Language (TDML)

  E-Tools
    EdaXML - EDIF replacement

  ChipData
    iParts Miner - extract part data from PDF, etc.

Mike illustrated XML display using Internet Explorer 5 (and planned for
Netscape 6), collapsing sections to hide data, and editing with XML Notepad.

A number of comments were made during the presentation. An XML version of
IBIS would eliminate the need for an IBIS parser to check syntax. Only value
checking would be needed. Other tools may work with or export markup language
formats.

Mike is submitting examples of IBIS Syntax as part of uploaded presentation.

A MACRO LANGUAGE FOR IBIS
Al Davis, HyperLynx
Al Davis had presented some draft documents at the January 31, 2000 IBIS
Summit Meeting. The macro language gets around the IBIS fixed syntax
problem (and BIRDs) and also is compatible with nodal representation and
with the familiar aspects of IBIS. It is backwards compatible with IBIS.

The circuit topology can be defined in the language. Al illustrated this
with a simple Vsource, Rsource variable voltage and variable resistance
driver model.

The language includes inheritance, correlation (typ/min/max) and conditionals.
It contains some basic Spice elements (R, L, C, V, I, E, G) and some Spice
extras. Also some Non-Spice driver, trigger and alarm elements and some
programming (assert, define, export, if, inherit, local and select) elements
can be added.

For receiver modeling, Al added fixed delay (digital or analog), variable
delay (digital or analog) and analog behavioral blocks (gain, filter,
integrate). Other elements for compatibility with driver schedule and
submodels include reshape (digital) and array of components.

IMIC style transistors and transmission lines can be considered. Currently,
the macro language is 100% with IBIS Version 3.2. More study is needed for
receivers. Pad to pin details need to be addressed. So far, one meeting and
one teleconference meeting have been held. More meetings are now scheduled.

GENERAL DISCUSSION
During and after the presentation, a general discussion occurred on all topics.
A few comments are captured here.

Arpad Muranyi commented that the nodal connectivity and building block approach
is natural to the application. Al Davis commented that the macro approach
could be an extension to Spice. Fred Balistreri commented that mixed mode
simulation was still not a reality because of iteration problems. Someone
comment that IMIC could serve as the starting point. It has the Spice like
syntax, and IBIS data sheet information could be added.

A macro language would serve all vendors. A set of primitives may be
implemented differently (or not implemented) by different vendors. Milt
Schwartz stressed that application engineers often do the model development.
The device design engineers are not involved, and the reference Spice models
are usually not available. So model developers should have an easy, familiar,
simple language. John Angulo commented that Verilog-AMS and VHDL-AMS were
verbose syntaxes.

An advantage with moving forward with a macro language approach is that the
Spice and IBIS syntaxes are familiar to the model developers.

All of the approaches need to be prototyped. Michael Cohen is interested in
working with someone (Ken Bakalar) on a VHDL-AMS implementation of IBIS. The
XML implementation of IBIS can also be checked.

FUTURE MEETINGS
Bob Ross closed the discussion by noting that several teleconference meetings
have been scheduled. The next teleconference meeting will be held on June 30,
2000 and conducted by Guy de Burgh since both Stephen Peters and Bob will be
out. (They still may call in.)

The next IBIS Summit Meeting is scheduled on Thursday, September 14, 2000 in
Worcester, Massachusetts at the same time as the PCBEAST 2000 conference.

Mike LaBonte will host the IBIS futures group teleconference Working Group
meeting on Wednesday, June 14, 2000. The Connector Specification Working
Group will continue meeting, but the next date has not been scheduled.

NEXT MEETING:
The next teleconference meeting will be on Friday, June 30, 2000 from 8:00 AM
to 10:00 AM. Guy de Burgh will be conducting the meeting.

==============================================================================
                                      NOTES

IBIS CHAIR: Bob Ross (503) 685-0732, Fax (503) 685-4897
            bob_ross@mentor.com
            Modeling Engineer, Mentor Graphics
            8005 S.W. Boeckman Road, Wilsonville, OR 97070

VICE CHAIR: Stephen Peters (503) 264-4108, Fax: (503) 264-4515
            sjpeters@ichips.intel.com
            Senior Hardware Engineer, Intel Corporation
            M/S JF1-209
            2111 NE 25th Ave.
            Hillsboro, OR 97124-5961

SECRETARY: Guy de Burgh (805) 988-8250, Fax: (805) 988-8259
            gdeburgh@innoveda.com
            Senior Manager, Innoveda
            1369 Del Norte Rd.
            Camarillo, CA 93010-8437

LIBRARIAN: Mike LaBonte (978) 262-6496, Fax: (978) 446-6798
            mikelabonte@cadence.com
            Senior Technologist, Cadence Design Systems
            270 Billerica Road
            Chelmsford, MA 01824

WEBMASTER: Syed Huq (408) 525-3399, Fax: (408) 526-5504
            shuq@cisco.com
            Manager, Hardware Engineering, Cisco Systems
            170 West Tasman Drive
            San Jose, CA 95134-1706

POSTMASTER: John Angulo (425) 869-2320, Fax: (425) 881-1008
            angulo@hyperlynx.com
            Development Engineer, HyperLynx, Inc.
            114715 N.E. 95th Street
            Redmond, WA 98052

This meeting was conducted in accordance with the EIA Legal Guides and EIA
Manual of Organization and Procedure.

The following e-mail addresses are used:

  ibis-request@eda.org
      To join, change, or drop from either the IBIS Open Forum Reflector
      (ibis@eda.org), the IBIS Users' Group Reflector (ibis-users@eda.org)
      or both. State your request.

  ibis-info@eda.org
      To obtain general information about IBIS, to ask specific questions
      for individual response, and to inquire about joining the EIA-IBIS
      Open Forum as a full Member.

  ibis@eda.org
      To send a message to the general IBIS Open Forum Reflector. This
      is used mostly for IBIS Standardization business and future IBIS
      technical enhancements. Job posting information is not permitted.

  ibis-users@eda.org
      To send a message to the IBIS Users' Group Reflector. This is
      used mostly for IBIS clarification, current modeling issues, and
      general user concerns. Job posting information is not permitted.

  ibischk-bug@eda.org
      To report ibischk2/3 parser bugs. The Bug Report Form Resides on
      eda.org in /pub/ibis/bugs/ibischk/bugform.txt along with reported bugs.

      To report s2ibis, s2ibis2 and s2iplt bugs, use the Bug Report Forms
      which reside under eda.org in /pub/ibis/bugs/s2ibis/bugs2i.txt,
      /pub/ibis/bugs/s2ibis2/bugs2i2.txt, & /pub/ibis/bugs/s2iplt/bugsplt.txt
      respectively.

Information on IBIS technical contents, IBIS participants, and actual
IBIS models are available on the IBIS Home page found by selecting the
Electronic Information Group under:

  http://www.eia.org/eig/ibis/ibis.htm

Check the pub/ibis directory on eda.org for more information on previous
discussions and results. You can get on via FTP anonymous.
==============================================================================
Received on Tue Jun 13 14:44:55 2000

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 03 2011 - 09:52:30 PDT