RE: RE: Re[2]: Connector spec swathing

Gus,

> Chris,
> We may want to call upon you for your help with this activity.
> Would you be
> available?

I'll help where I can...

Bob's example is a good starting point for uniform internal coupling but as
he states it could be generalized further for non-uniform internal coupling
(as well as the other generalizations he mentions if they are allowed by the
spec). My assumption is that the Connector Spec does not restrict a swath
to have uniform internal coupling. Now if uniform coupling is the norm then
I guess we're ready to party.

BTW: Does Molex/Amp/Teradyne already have a app note describing swath
expansion beyond Bob's posting?

Chris Rokusek
Innoveda

> -----Original Message-----
> From: apanella@molex.com [mailto:apanella@molex.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 11:49 AM
> To: IBIS Mailing list
> Subject: Re:RE: Re[2]: Connector spec swathing
>
>
> Chris,
>
> My basic reply was to the comment that we should just create full
> matrices and
> be done with it... To this I disagree..
>
> I agree that it would be nice to have an "example" (less stronger than
> "recommended") of a "swath implementation". I am not sure that
> there should be
> a downside to this activity... other than the time it would take
> to contribute
> to the common good.
>
> As with this issue and as with the specification to date, I would
> be willing to
> work with someone to make it happen. I think the sub-committee
> could take this
> on... but I wouldn't want to overstep my inference space.
>
> IBISCnn Subcommittee... I think we are good with making an example....
> maybe??? Either way... let's put this issue to bed (To make an
> example or not
> make an example, that is the question :) ) at out next subcommittee
> teleconference.
>
> Chris,
> We may want to call upon you for your help with this activity.
> Would you be
> available?
>
>
> _gus: 630-527-4617
>
<snip>
Received on Thu Jun 15 14:50:46 2000