RE: [IBIS] IBIS Summit Minutes (July 25, 2006)

Michael,

I feel that you miss-quoted me in the discussion on efficiency of
S-parameter implementations.


Ian Dodd noted that some S-parameter convolution implementations do not
necessarily use a fixed timestep.  Some debate ensued whether the use
of a variable timestep approach is to increase accuracy or simulation
speed.

I feel this should read:


Ian Dodd noted that some S-parameter implementations do not
necessarily use either convolution or a fixed timestep.  Some debate
ensued whether the use
of a variable timestep approach is to increase accuracy or simulation
speed. 

Thanks

Ian

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ibis@server.eda-stds.org
[mailto:owner-ibis@server.eda-stds.org] On Behalf Of Mirmak, Michael
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 3:41 PM
To: ibis@server.eda-stds.org
Subject: [IBIS] IBIS Summit Minutes (July 25, 2006)

Attached are the minutes of the Tuesday, July 25, 2006 IBIS Open Forum
Summit.

- Michael Mirmak
  Intel Corp.
  Chair, EIA IBIS Open Forum




--------------------------------------------------------------------
|For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, e-mail majordomo@eda-stds.org
|with the appropriate command message(s) in the body:
|
|  help
|  subscribe   ibis       <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  subscribe   ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  unsubscribe ibis       <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different>
|
|or e-mail a request to ibis-request@eda-stds.org.
|
|IBIS reflector archives exist under:
|
|  http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/ Recent
|  http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/ Recent
|  http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email/         E-mail since 1993