XTK = QuadDesign-->Viewlogic--->Innoveda--->Mentor - Syed -----Original Message----- From: owner-ibis@eda.org [mailto:owner-ibis@eda.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Ko Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 2:11 PM To: Akhilesh CHANDRA; 'Todd Westerhoff'; ibis@eda-stds.org Cc: Akhilesh CHANDRA Subject: RE: [IBIS] How we can model startup time in IBIS. Akhiesh, It's XTK from the formerly QuadDesign/Viewlogic. I believe Mentor bought it and might still be selling it. -Kevin --- Akhilesh CHANDRA <akhilesh.chandra@st.com> wrote: > Hello Kevin, > > Thanx for this info.Which simulator you are using. > > Regards > Akhilesh > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ibis@eda.org [mailto:owner-ibis@eda.org] On Behalf Of > Kevin Ko > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:37 PM > To: Akhilesh CHANDRA; 'Todd Westerhoff'; ibis@eda-stds.org > Cc: Akhilesh CHANDRA > Subject: RE: [IBIS] How we can model startup time in IBIS. > > > Akhilesh, > > The simulator that I used to have, XTK/Quad, has an offset parameter > called "time to Vm". The simulated delay numbers are added or > substracted, depending on whether it's a positve or negative offset, > to give you the delay that you needed to match your spice sim delay or > start time. This can be done in post-processing as well, just an extra > step for you. It is a lot easier that trying to adjust the load > reference to "match" your spice delay requirement. > > regards, > kevin > > > > --- Akhilesh CHANDRA <akhilesh.chandra@st.com> wrote: > > > hello Todd, > > > > Thanx for this important info. I have one doubt. > > > > According to paragraph 3 "IBIS simulations are always compared to > > a simulation of a "reference load", because the comparison to the > > standard load simulation normalizes out the start time of the model". > > > > In my case cell delay is 300ps while it's startup time is 3ns. How > > it's normalizes when I use standard load. > > > > Regards > > Akhilesh > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-ibis@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-ibis@server.eda.org] > > On Behalf Of Todd Westerhoff > > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 6:48 PM > > To: ibis@server.eda-stds.org > > Subject: RE: [IBIS] How we can model startup time in IBIS. > > > > Akhilesh, > > > > If you or your customers are correlating simulation results in IBIS > > to a transistor level equivalent, it's important to understand that > > "time 0" in an IBIS model is arbitrary. There's no guarantee that > > an IBIS and transistor model simulated side by side will produce > > outputs at the same time, and "shifting" the IBIS result in time to > > get correlation is completely legal. > > > > Bonnie's article made this same point. She mentioned that a > > transistor model includes the delay through the buffer, while the > > IBIS model represents the output behavior but not necessarily the > > model's > intrinsic delay. > > > > This is the reason IBIS simulations are always compared to a > > simulation of a "reference load", because the comparison to the > > standard load simulation normalizes out the start time of the model. > > > > If you're looking to use SI simulations to derive an interconnect > > delay for plugging back into a timing analysis, you should ALWAYS be > > normalizing your SI simulations to a reference load. The startup > > time of the model gets subtracted out in this case, and you should > > end up with the same number for the interconnect delay whether you > > use the > transistor or IBIS model. > > > > Some would argue that transistor level simulations don't need to be > > normalized; I would disagree. It's true that you can define > > specific timing and SI strategies where normalization of transistor > > level SI simulations isn't required; but most people aren't running > > analysis under those conditions. > > > > Todd. > > > > Todd Westerhoff > > VP, Software Products > > SiSoft > > 6 Clock Tower Place, Suite 250 > > Maynard, MA 01754 > > (978) 461-0449 x24 > > twesterh@sisoft.com > > www.sisoft.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-ibis@eda.org [mailto:owner-ibis@eda.org] On Behalf Of > > Akhilesh CHANDRA > > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 1:53 AM > > To: 'Dunbar, Tony'; ibis@eda-stds.org > > Cc: Akhilesh CHANDRA > > Subject: RE: [IBIS] How we can model startup time in IBIS. > > > > Hello Tony, > > > > Thanx for your reply. Initial delay is not important for SI > > simulations but if it's missing in our model then it's difficult to > > match spice and IBIS results also few customers use these models > > for delay calculation if I don't support this startup time then > > customer have only 300ps delay while in silicon it's 3.3ns. > > > > Regards > > Akhilesh > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-ibis@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-ibis@server.eda.org] > > On Behalf Of Dunbar, Tony > > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 10:22 PM > > To: ibis@server.eda-stds.org > > Subject: RE: [IBIS] How we can model startup time in IBIS. > > > > Hi Akhilesh, > > > > I've pondered this for a little while and all I can come up with is > > to ask why is this an important or even relevant functional detail > > to be included in a signal integrity simulation, presuming it is a > > signal integrity simulation you are wanting to do? > > > > An "initial delay" can be incorporated into the stimulus of some SI > > simulators but that is really intended to provide for > > driver-to-driver skew, whereas your brief description refers to "startup". > > > > Regards, > > Tony > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-ibis@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-ibis@server.eda.org] > > On Behalf Of Akhilesh CHANDRA > > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 4:18 AM > > To: ibis@server.eda-stds.org > > Cc: Akhilesh CHANDRA > > Subject: [IBIS] How we can model startup time in IBIS. > > > > > > > > Hello Experts, > > > > I am doing IBIS model of an IO operating at 800MHZ frequency. It > > have startup time of 3nsec. After 3ns design gives output of 800mhz > > frequency. If I model this time in waveform database of IBIS models > > the I have over clocking issue and design is not work at this high > > frequency. Can you help me to model this startup time. Is anyone > > make IBIS > model of such designs. > > > > Regards > > Akhilesh > > > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by > > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > |For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, e-mail majordomo@eda-stds.org > > |with the appropriate command message(s) in the body: > > | > > | help > > | subscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> > > | subscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> > > | unsubscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> > > | unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> > > | > > |or e-mail a request to ibis-request@eda-stds.org. > > | > > |IBIS reflector archives exist under: > > | > > | http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/ Recent > > | http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/ Recent > > | http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email/ E-mail since 1993 > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by > > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > |For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, e-mail majordomo@eda-stds.org > > |with the appropriate command message(s) in the body: > > | > > | help > > | subscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> > > | subscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> > > | unsubscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> > > | unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> > > | > > |or e-mail a request to ibis-request@eda-stds.org. > > | > > |IBIS reflector archives exist under: > > | > > | http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/ Recent > > | http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/ Recent > === message truncated === ________________________________________________________________________ ____________Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -------------------------------------------------------------------- |For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, e-mail majordomo@eda-stds.org |with the appropriate command message(s) in the body: | | help | subscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | subscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | |or e-mail a request to ibis-request@eda-stds.org. | |IBIS reflector archives exist under: | | http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email/ E-mail since 1993 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -------------------------------------------------------------------- |For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, e-mail majordomo@eda-stds.org |with the appropriate command message(s) in the body: | | help | subscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | subscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | |or e-mail a request to ibis-request@eda-stds.org. | |IBIS reflector archives exist under: | | http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email/ E-mail since 1993Received on Fri May 18 16:31:01 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 18 2007 - 16:31:45 PDT