Hello Everyone, We ran across an IBIS file in which the [Pin Mapping] keyword is placed before the [Pin] keyword. It seems that the IBIS parser is not complaining about this, as there are no errors. I don't recall any requirements in the specification about the order of the keywords. On the other hand, if we want to make it easier on the tools, it would make sense to have certain keywords in a certain order. Could someone comment on this? Does the IBIS specification really have no requirements about the order of these keywords? Was this intentional or an oversight? Thanks, Arpad ================================================================= -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -------------------------------------------------------------------- |For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, e-mail mikelabonte@eda-stds.org |or ibis-request@eda-stds.org | |IBIS reflector archives exist under: | | http://www.eda-stds.org/ibis/email_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda-stds.org/ibis/users_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda-stds.org/ibis/email/ E-mail since 1993Received on Mon Dec 16 12:20:15 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 16 2013 - 12:20:52 PST