Jim and Weston and Tim, This came up at the last Summit. There are some IBIS keywords that are rarely used (such as diode [TTgnd],[TTpower]). Because they are so rare, these have not been implemented by a number of SI tools. I am not aware of any SI tool that implements 100% of the keywords and subparameters for IBIS 3.2. There is a one very good reason to use [IBIS Ver] 4.1. That will force the most complete set of parser checks to be made. This is true even if only IBIS 3.2 features are used, since only the latest parser version has all of the parser bug patches. Best regards, Lynne "IBIS training when you need it, where you need it." Dr. Lynne Green Green Streak Programs http://www.greenstreakprograms.com 425-788-0412 lgreen22@mindspring.com _____ From: owner-ibis-users@eda.org [mailto:owner-ibis-users@eda.org] On Behalf Of Nash, Tim J (FL51) Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 2:36 PM To: Beal, Weston; ibis-users@eda.org Subject: RE: [IBIS-Users] Which IBIS version to use??? Weston, I've noticed what you are talking about. If you look in any documentation for ICX or Hyperlinx (I'm not sure about SpectraQuest), I don't think that global support for any particular version of IBIS is explicitly stated anywhere. I'm not sure why this is. Is it because the standard is in such a state of flux (i.e. growth of keywords) or is the reason more political in nature? I know I'm speculating as to what the reason may be, but it makes it difficult to plan any sort of analysis, when your not clearly sure of what a tool does and doesn't support without reading the manual cover-to-cover. If tools said they support version 3.2, then you could rest assured that it supported EVERYTHING in 3.2, not just KEY FEATURES of 3.2. Thanks, Tim _____ From: owner-ibis-users@eda.org [mailto:owner-ibis-users@eda.org] On Behalf Of Beal, Weston Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 5:06 PM To: ibis-users@eda.org Subject: RE: [IBIS-Users] Which IBIS version to use??? Tim, Since IBIS 2.1 I've not seen any simulator that support and utilizes all keywords and parameters of any version of the IBIS spec. You need to evaluate what aspects of the IBIS spec apply to your I/O pins and use those appropriate keywords. Then you specify the IBIS version of the file to be the lowest number that includes the features you've used. Throughout this process you should read the latest version of the specification since it will be the clearest and most complete description of the various features. Even though ICX might not explicitly state that it supports IBIS 4.1, it does support the [external model], [external circuit], [node declaration], and [circuit call] keywords quite well. Check the ICX modeling guide for slight differences from the official IBIS syntax. Regards, Weston _____ From: owner-ibis-users@eda.org [mailto:owner-ibis-users@eda.org] On Behalf Of Nash, Tim J (FL51) Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 12:27 PM To: ibis-users@eda.org Subject: [IBIS-Users] Which IBIS version to use??? There seems to be some confusion among my peers as to which IBIS version we should be working to. The latest ANSI version appears to be 3.2, but there are specifications available up to 4.1. The parser available in latest released versions of Hyperlinx and ICX is still v3.2, so I'm not sure that Hyperlinx or ICX would even recognize v4.1 keywords. Is there an "official" committee recommendation of what version should be utilized in new designs - the latest available, or the latest ANSI approved version? Thanks in advance, Tim __________________________________ Timothy J. Nash, P.E. Honeywell, Inc. Defense & Space Electronic Systems 13350 U.S. Hwy 19 N M/S 825-1 Clearwater, FL 33764-7290 Office : 727-539-2437 Fax : 727-539-2183 Email : tim.j.nash@honeywell.com |------------------------------------------------------------------ |For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, email majordomo@eda.org |with just the appropriate command message(s) in the body: | | help | subscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | subscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | |or email a written request to ibis-request@eda.org. | |IBIS reflector archives exist under: | | http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/email/ E-mail since 1993Received on Tue Jul 12 22:10:07 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 12 2005 - 22:10:58 PDT