Hi, I saw some discussions on c_comp issue at user archive at link: http://www.eda.org/ibis/users_archive/0487.html I am confused by the c_comp whether it is double-counted and the different result obtained when using different tools. According to the comment in the link above, varying the c_comp may see the changes in rise/fall curve. This is definitely true when using the HSPICE simulator. But, if you using the latest Hyperlynx version 8.2.1, changing the c_comp will not reflect the changes in rise/fall curve. Can you please advise which tools are showing the correct response on c_comp when sweeping at different value? Thanks. Regards, Ling Li ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice. This message may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachments, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -------------------------------------------------------------------- |For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, e-mail mikelabonte@eda-stds.org |or ibis-request@eda-stds.org | |IBIS reflector archives exist under: | | http://www.eda-stds.org/ibis/email_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda-stds.org/ibis/users_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda-stds.org/ibis/email/ E-mail since 1993Received on Tue Sep 3 22:47:13 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 03 2013 - 22:47:53 PDT