Hello Prabhu:
It is a general requirement that all defined names for a
particular keyword be unique. This may have been an
obvious, but undocumented understanding. I also cannot find
an explicit reference, but the parser should report name
duplication errors. This general understanding is further
re-enforced by the contrary argument that there is no text
describing which of any duplicate definition should be used.
If several components are added to a file (perhaps to create
a library file), the included [Model] names must use unique
names, or duplicate [Model]s need to be deleted.
Bob
Mohan, Prabhu wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I am trying to include 2 components in one model file. Is it an IBIS
> requirement that the model names should not repeat between components? By
> doing so I get an error on ibischk3. If it is in the spec can some one point
> to the page. It is neither under [Component] nor under [Pin].
>
> Thanks
> Prabhu
-- Bob Ross Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC 2926 SE Yamhill St. Device Modeling Division Portland, OR 97214 13610 SW Harness Lane 503-239-5536 Beaverton, OR 97008 http://www.teraspeed.com 503-430-1065 bob@teraspeed.com 503-246-8048 Direct |------------------------------------------------------------------ |For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, email majordomo@eda.org |with just the appropriate command message(s) in the body: | | help | subscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | subscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | |or email a written request to ibis-request@eda.org. | |IBIS reflector archives exist under: | | http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/email/ E-mail since 1993Received on Thu May 20 21:32:33 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 20 2004 - 21:32:52 PDT