RE: [IBIS] Question on IBIS Quality Spec Interpretation (section 4.4.2)

From: Mike LaBonte \(milabont\) <milabont_at_.....>
Date: Tue Sep 12 2006 - 16:53:32 PDT
Ray,
 
First, I'm happy to see you using the IBIS Quality Specification. If you
wish I can add you to the IQ reflector on Freelists.
 
An IBIS Quality task force working review copy of the IBIS Quality
Specification adds a footnote to IQ 4.4.2:
 
   ibischk v4.0.2 detects this, but [IBIS ver] must be 4
 
So the IQ 4.4.2 check as described is the one already performed by
ibischk. According to the note ibischk currently performs the check this
way only in IBIS 4.x files. But looking at the ibischk code I think it
will check combined curves for all files, not just 4.x and above. So the
note may be partly mistaken.
 
The net result is that you only need run ibischk to check this. An
example of the warning:
 
WARNING - Model testbuf: The [Falling Waveform]
      with [R_fixture]=50 Ohms and [V_fixture_min]=3V
      has MIN column DC endpoints of  2.00V and  3.00v, but
      an equivalent load applied to the model's I-V tables yields
      different voltages ( 1.93V and  3.00V),
      a difference of  6.50% and  0.00%, respectively.
 
Mike


________________________________

From: owner-ibis@eda.org [mailto:owner-ibis@eda.org] On Behalf Of Ray
Anderson
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 3:20 PM
To: ibis@eda-stds.org; ibis-users@eda.org
Cc: Ray Anderson
Subject: [IBIS] Question on IBIS Quality Spec Interpretation (section
4.4.2)



 

One of our development groups is currently reviewing one of our new IBIS
models for LEVEL 0 compliance prior to initial issue to customers. A
question has come up regarding the interpretation of section 4.4.2 in
the iq_specification.txt document (IBIS QUALITY SPECIFICATION - Revision
1.0).

 

 

While the text of the document defines the intent very precisely, can
someone please provide an interpretation of what really needs to be
checked?

 

Initially the group thought it was as simple as verifying that the
voltages at the endoints of the V-T table were within 2% of the endpoint
voltages in the I-V tables, but after re-reading section 4.4.2 we are
not convinced that is a correct interpretation.

 

 

 

4.4.2  {LEVEL 0}  V-T table endpoints consistent with I-V tables

 

  The voltage associated with the intersection of the V_fixture,
R_fixture,

  and R_dut (if present) load line with the respective combined high/low

  DC I-V characteristic should be within 2% of the V-T table DC
endpoints

  based on the V-T table DC range.

 

  The combined High State DC I-V characteristic is defined as the sum

  of the [Power Clamp], [GND Clamp], and [Pullup] I-V tables (ground

  relative). Similarly, the combined Low State DC I-V characteristic is

  defined as the sum of the [Power Clamp], [GND clamp], and [Pulldown]

  I-V tables (ground relative).

 

 

 

-Ray Anderson

 

Raymond Anderson

Senior Signal Integrity Staff Engineer

Product Technology Department

Advanced Package R&D

Xilinx Inc.

 

 


--------------------------------------------------------------------
|For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, e-mail majordomo@eda-stds.org
|with the appropriate command message(s) in the body:
|
|  help
|  subscribe   ibis       <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  subscribe   ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  unsubscribe ibis       <optional e-mail address, if different>
|  unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different>
|
|or e-mail a request to ibis-request@eda-stds.org.
|
|IBIS reflector archives exist under:
|
|  http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/ Recent
|  http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/ Recent
|  http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email/         E-mail since 1993
Received on Tue Sep 12 16:53:44 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 12 2006 - 16:54:32 PDT