Re: Ver. 3.2 and Ver. 2.1 Models

Dear Mike Magdaluyo,

I concur with Bob Ross, except I would suggest still setting the IBIS_ver
keyword to 3.2. If nothing else, that will cause IBISCHK3 to use it's most
strict syntax/semantic tests.

Best regards,
Matthew Flora

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Ross" <bob_ross@mentorg.com>
To: <mike.magdaluyo@philips.com>
Cc: <ibis-users@eda.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: Ver. 3.2 and Ver. 2.1 Models

> Mike:
>
> I would use and supply Version 3.2 models only when Version 3.2 features
> are needed to accurately describe the part. Otherwise, I would still
> supply Version 2.1 models.
>
> Bob Ross
> Mentor Graphics
>
> mike.magdaluyo@philips.com wrote:
> >
> > To Model Users and EDA Vendors:
> >
> > Philips Semiconductors offers numerous standard logic Ver. 2.1 IBIS
models. We are planning to start generating Ver. 3.2 models but would like
your feedback on an issue. We are trying assess how many people have
capability to run Ver 3.2 models and who
> > can use only Ver 2.1 models. Due to the number of logic families and
products we have, we want to avoid maintaining 2 sets of libraries per product
family for both versions, but we need to see that our customers' needs are met
too. Your comments would
> > be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Mike Magdaluyo
> >
> > Logic Products Group
> > Philips Semiconductors
> > (408) 991-2642
>
Received on Thu Jul 20 16:48:24 2000