RE: Note on Rev

From: Peters, Stephen <stephen.peters@intel.com>
Date: Thu Jul 05 2001 - 15:29:18 PDT

Hi Scott:

  The reason for the column 1 requirement lies in the arbitrary length of
the [Notes] field. As IBIS is defined, (implicitly by the golden parser in
Ver 3.2, explicitly in IBIS-X), the [Notes] field ends when the next keyword
is encountered. However, a real life case arose in which a keyword was used
*within* the note. The parser encountered it, ended the [Notes] section,
and subsequently bombed on the remaining notes text. The fix was to
recognize [...] as keyword only when the opening bracket was in column 1.
As I mentioned, this rule was formalized in IBIS-X (which is where the
General Syntax Rules and Guidelines in the connector spec came from).

  Regards,
  Stephen Peters
  Intel Corp.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott McMorrow [mailto:scott@vasthorizons.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 12:21 PM
To: apanella@molex.com; ibis
Subject: Re: Note on Rev

All,

I see no reason why on page 3 of the document the following
is a requirement:

3) Keywords must be enclosed in square brackets, [ ] , and must start in
column 1
of the line.

The column 1 requirement seems a bit antiquated to me.

regards,

scott

--
Scott McMorrow
Principal Engineer
SiQual, Signal Quality Engineering
18735 SW Boones Ferry Road
Tualatin, OR  97062-3090
(503) 885-1231
http://www.siqual.com
apanella@molex.com wrote:
> <<File: icm0.pdf>>Good Catch Arpad...
>
> All...  See attached...  with correct revision number
>
> I am sending the doc again... see attached...  I didn't think this
correction
> was worth a revision number.
>
> _gus
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Muranyi, Arpad" <arpad.muranyi@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 1:35 PM
> To: apanella
> Subject: RE: 0.969 attached...
>
> The title page still shows rev 0.968...
>
> Arpad
> =======================================
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: apanella
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 1:16 PM
> To: '"Peters, Stephen" <stephen.peters@intel.com>'; '"Al Davis
> <aldavis@ieee.org>" <aldavis@ieee.org>'; '"Bob Ross
> <bob_ross@mentorg.com>" <bob_ross@mentorg.com>'; '"Chris Reid
> <chris_reid@mentorg.com>" <chris_reid@mentorg.com>'; '"DC Sessions
> <ibis@lumbercartel.com>" <ibis@lumbercartel.com>'; '"Gerald Bannert
> <gerald.bannert@icn.siemens.de>" <gerald.bannert@icn.siemens.de>';
> '"Greg Edlund <gedlund@us.ibm.com>" <gedlund@us.ibm.com>'; '"John Angulo
> <angulo@hyperlynx.com>" <angulo@hyperlynx.com>'; '"Lynne Green
> <lgreen@cadence.com>" <lgreen@cadence.com>'; '"Muranyi, Arpad"
> <arpad.muranyi@intel.com>'; '"Scott McMorrow <scott@vasthorizons.com>"
> <scott@vasthorizons.com>'; '"Steve Nolan <s-nolan1@ti.com>"
> <s-nolan1@ti.com>'
> Subject: RE: 0.969 attached...
>
> See attached...
>
> The major revision in the attached document is per the last teleconference
that
> I attended.
>
> Basically it revolves around making the subparameters in 968 more line an
> assigned variable as seen in IBISX
>
> This was done for both the sub parameters for [Begin Cn Model] and the
matrix
> section.
>
> The "matrix" portion probably needs more work.
>
> We can use this for review on Tuesday.
>
> _gus
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
>                Name: ICM0.PDF
>    ICM0.PDF    Type: Acrobat (application/pdf)
>            Encoding: base64
 
Received on Thu Jul 5 15:29:33 2001

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 03 2011 - 09:53:47 PDT