RE: Note on Rev

Scott,

But what if someone wants to mention a keyword inside comments,
or the disclaimer, etc...?

Arpad
================================================================

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott McMorrow [mailto:scott@vasthorizons.com]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 9:55 AM
To: Peters, Stephen
Cc: apanella@molex.com; ibis
Subject: Re: Note on Rev

Stephen,

I have the following suggestions to eliminate this problem:

1) Require that keywords do not appear in any text blocks. Where a keyword
is defined to include the [keyword] syntax. This would
be an unusual circumstance anyway. It is highly unlikely that in production
models that a [keyword] would appear in a text block
sections. These sorts of things generally only occur in examples and can be
easily removed.

2) Require an [End Block] keyword for all sections with text blocks.

The requirement that keywords begin in column 1 seems more onerous to me
than either of these suggestions. I would "really" like to
be able to use indented structure within all future models to facilitate
better understandability. Also, I would really like to not
have to deal with a stupid parser that spits out my files when somehow I
managed to create a model that does not position a keyword
in column 1.

regards,

scott

--
Scott McMorrow
Principal Engineer
SiQual, Signal Quality Engineering
18735 SW Boones Ferry Road
Tualatin, OR  97062-3090
(503) 885-1231
http://www.siqual.com
"Peters, Stephen" wrote:
> Hi Scott:
>
>   The reason for the column 1 requirement lies in the arbitrary length of
> the [Notes] field. As IBIS is defined, (implicitly by the golden parser in
> Ver 3.2, explicitly in IBIS-X), the [Notes] field ends when the next
keyword
> is encountered.  However, a real life case arose in which a keyword was
used
> *within* the note.  The parser encountered it, ended the [Notes] section,
> and subsequently bombed on the remaining notes text.  The fix was to
> recognize [...] as keyword only when the opening bracket was in column 1.
> As I mentioned, this rule was formalized in IBIS-X (which is where the
> General Syntax Rules and Guidelines in the connector spec came from).
>
>   Regards,
>   Stephen Peters
>   Intel Corp.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott McMorrow [mailto:scott@vasthorizons.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 12:21 PM
> To: apanella@molex.com; ibis
> Subject: Re: Note on Rev
>
> All,
>
> I see no reason why on page 3 of the document the following
> is a requirement:
>
> 3) Keywords must be enclosed in square brackets, [ ] , and must start in
> column 1
> of the line.
>
> The column 1 requirement seems a bit antiquated to me.
>
> regards,
>
> scott
>
> --
> Scott McMorrow
> Principal Engineer
> SiQual, Signal Quality Engineering
> 18735 SW Boones Ferry Road
> Tualatin, OR  97062-3090
> (503) 885-1231
> http://www.siqual.com
>
> apanella@molex.com wrote:
>
> > <<File: icm0.pdf>>Good Catch Arpad...
> >
> > All...  See attached...  with correct revision number
> >
> > I am sending the doc again... see attached...  I didn't think this
> correction
> > was worth a revision number.
> >
> > _gus
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Muranyi, Arpad" <arpad.muranyi@intel.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 1:35 PM
> > To: apanella
> > Subject: RE: 0.969 attached...
> >
> > The title page still shows rev 0.968...
> >
> > Arpad
> > =======================================
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: apanella
> > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 1:16 PM
> > To: '"Peters, Stephen" <stephen.peters@intel.com>'; '"Al Davis
> > <aldavis@ieee.org>" <aldavis@ieee.org>'; '"Bob Ross
> > <bob_ross@mentorg.com>" <bob_ross@mentorg.com>'; '"Chris Reid
> > <chris_reid@mentorg.com>" <chris_reid@mentorg.com>'; '"DC Sessions
> > <ibis@lumbercartel.com>" <ibis@lumbercartel.com>'; '"Gerald Bannert
> > <gerald.bannert@icn.siemens.de>" <gerald.bannert@icn.siemens.de>';
> > '"Greg Edlund <gedlund@us.ibm.com>" <gedlund@us.ibm.com>'; '"John Angulo
> > <angulo@hyperlynx.com>" <angulo@hyperlynx.com>'; '"Lynne Green
> > <lgreen@cadence.com>" <lgreen@cadence.com>'; '"Muranyi, Arpad"
> > <arpad.muranyi@intel.com>'; '"Scott McMorrow <scott@vasthorizons.com>"
> > <scott@vasthorizons.com>'; '"Steve Nolan <s-nolan1@ti.com>"
> > <s-nolan1@ti.com>'
> > Subject: RE: 0.969 attached...
> >
> > See attached...
> >
> > The major revision in the attached document is per the last
teleconference
> that
> > I attended.
> >
> > Basically it revolves around making the subparameters in 968 more line
an
> > assigned variable as seen in IBISX
> >
> > This was done for both the sub parameters for [Begin Cn Model] and the
> matrix
> > section.
> >
> > The "matrix" portion probably needs more work.
> >
> > We can use this for review on Tuesday.
> >
> > _gus
> >
> >
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------------
> >                Name: ICM0.PDF
> >    ICM0.PDF    Type: Acrobat (application/pdf)
> >            Encoding: base64