Subject: [IBIS-Users] Spice vs Signal Explorer simulations.
From: John Phillippe (john.phillippe@motorola.com)
Date: Wed Jul 09 2003 - 14:00:14 PDT
I have been running ibis simulations using Signal Explorer, and then
checking the results against spice simulations to get my models
accurate. My test setup is simple. I just run 1 pulse through the
buffers, to get a rising and falling edge. My load is a transmission
line, then then a cap. I have noticed on a few simulations, that the
signal explorer simulations give a rising edge twice as fast as my spice
simulations. I'm wondering if this is cause for concern or not. Anyone
have any ideas?
-- John Phillippe SPS, 32 Bit Embedded Controller Division, IC Creation Motorola - 512-895-1835 Austin, TX - john.phillippe@motorola.com|------------------------------------------------------------------ |For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, email majordomo@eda.org |with just the appropriate command message(s) in the body: | | help | subscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | subscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | |or email a written request to ibis-request@eda.org. | |IBIS reflector archives exist under: | | http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/email/ E-mail since 1993
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jul 09 2003 - 14:01:50 PDT