Hello Michael, Thank you for your reply and adding me to the mailing list!!! Q1: >So, I would not expect traditional IBIS results to change if you alter the tool temperature setting. If you use IBIS 4.1 or 4.2 with Verilog-A or AMS code, and that code relies on temperature, you should see some effect, however. Do you have a sample of IBIS 4.1 or 4.2 with Verilog-A or AMS code which has temperature characteristic? If yes, could you send me it? If no, can I get it from the semiconductor vender? (Most IBIS models on Web are IBIS 2.* or 3.*. ) I would like to confirm the temperature characteristic of I/O buffer by simulation. Q2: I understood your answer. Q3: I have another question. In IBIS FAQ, IBIS model can perform the SSO analysis. http://www.eigroup.org/ibis/faq.htm#a6 I think that it is difficult to express the current of power node in IBIS model. Ex; I(power_clump), I(ground_clump) Can IBIS model express it? If yes, Which version of IBIS model can I do it? Which keyword of IBIS model is necessary? Is there a sample material of SSO analysis? Regards, Ryohei Kato -----Original Message----- From: Mirmak, Michael [mailto:michael.mirmak@intel.com] Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 2:38 AM To: ryohei.kato@synopsys.COM Subject: RE: BOUNCE ibis-users@eda.org: Non-member submission from ["Ryohei Kato" <Ryohei.Kato@synopsys.com>] Kato san, Thank you for your interest in IBIS! As you are not a subscriber to the mailing list, the reflector did not receive your message. We will add you to the list shortly. To answer your questions: 1) Traditional IBIS (meaning, IBIS that uses table data instead of AMS) is a "snapshot" of the behavior of a buffer under the named conditions. In other words, the voltage and temperature parameters describe what the part's state was when the I-V, V-t and C_comp data was extracted. No relationship is specified between the tables and the temperature or voltage; if the tool using the IBIS data does not interpolate a relationship, then changing simulation temperatures will not change the buffer's behavior. So, I would not expect traditional IBIS results to change if you alter the tool temperature setting. If you use IBIS 4.1 or 4.2 with Verilog-A or AMS code, and that code relies on temperature, you should see some effect, however. 2) This is determined by the tool; the IBIS model/file does not control the usage of the data. In the case of Synopsys HSPICE (which I assume you are using, from your e-mail address!), the "typ=xxx" line under the B-element would affect the buffer corner and therefore which tables are used. I hope this helps! Please consult the IBIS Cookbook for further details: http://www.eda-stds.org/ibis/cookbook/cookbook-v4.pdf - Michael Mirmak Intel Corp. Chair, EIA IBIS Open Forum -----Original Message----- Hello experts, I'm Ryohei Kato. I have a question about the IBIS model. Q1: Does the IBIS model have a temperature characteristic? When I analyze the IBIS model using HSPICE, I set the temperature sweep. (".temp 0 50 100") But all the simulation results became the same. If the IBIS model doesn't have it, for what is the property of "Temperature Range" used? Q2: The property of "PULLdown", "PULLup", etc... have the typical, max, and min column. How can I switch these in simulation? Please tell me the solution. Regards, Ryohei Kato -------------------------------------------------------------------- |For help or to subscribe/unsubscribe, e-mail majordomo@eda-stds.org |with the appropriate command message(s) in the body: | | help | subscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | subscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis <optional e-mail address, if different> | unsubscribe ibis-users <optional e-mail address, if different> | |or e-mail a request to ibis-request@eda-stds.org. | |IBIS reflector archives exist under: | | http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/users_archive/ Recent | http://www.eda-stds.org/pub/ibis/email/ E-mail since 1993Received on Mon Oct 9 19:12:27 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 09 2006 - 19:13:27 PDT